Suchergebnisse

Impacts of commercial aircraft operation upon the environment, which are caused primarily from emissions of CO2, NOx and the formation of contrails, are matter of growing concern, as aviation is one of the fastest developing industrial sectors worldwide and the awareness of its effects is expanding. Recent research has focused on the cost-benefit potential of different mitigation strategies, which optimize flight trajectories with respect to climate and economy, but most of these mitigation strategies cannot be implemented in the near future due to technical challenges. The objective of this paper is to present an interim mitigation strategy, which bridges this time period. In analogy to military exclusion zones, climate restricted airspaces (CRA) are defined based on 3-D climate change functions, characterizing the environmental impact caused by an aircraft emission at a certain location. Regions with climate costs greater than a threshold value are closed in the corresponding month; others are cleared for air traffic. To estimate the cost-benefit potential of this strategy, a preliminary analysis is conducted on the route from Helsinki (EFHK) to Miami (KMIA). Affected flight trajectories are re-routed optimally around resulting CRA with regard to monetary costs for varying threshold values. Therefore, flight simulation algorithms are developed, which solve a non-linear optimal control problem. For each optimized flight trajectory corresponding average temperature response (ATR) and cash operating costs (COC) are expressed relative to a reference great circle trajectory with constant Mach number and compared with the climate mitigation potential of climate optimized trajectories.

Although about two-thirds of aviation's climate impacts are caused by non-CO2 effects, such as ozone production or contrail cirrus formation, these effects are not yet considered in existing and currently planned policy instruments (e.g. EU ETS or CORSIA). Due to their climatological relevance, however, various economic concepts have been proposed recently to internalise nonCO2 effects. Most of these approaches are based on the principle of equivalent CO2 emissions (CO2e), a way of unitizing the impact of all climate agents. Several calculation methods for CO2 equivalents are in principle available, which differ in the degree of detail and are subject to uncertainties related to atmospheric science. There are a quite a few key decision parameters for policy makers for setting up a monitoring, reporting, and verification (MRV) scheme for non-CO2 effects. The aim of this study is therefore to analyze and discuss the most important decision parameters for the integration of non-CO2 aviation effects into EU ETS.

The strong growth rate of the aviation industry in recent years has created significant challenges in terms of environmental impact. Air traffic contributes to climate change through the emission of carbon dioxide (CO2) and other non-CO2 effects, and the associated climate impact is expected to soar further. The mitigation of CO2 contributions to the net climate impact can be achieved using novel propulsion, jet fuels, and continuous improvements of aircraft efficiency, whose solutions lack in immediacy. On the other hand, the climate impact associated with non- CO2 emissions, being responsible for two-thirds of aviation radiative forcing, varies highly with geographic location, altitude, and time of the emission. Consequently, these effects can be reduced by planning proper climate-aware trajectories. To investigate these possibilities, this paper presents a survey on operational strategies proposed in the literature to mitigate aviation"s climate impact. These approaches are classified based on their methodology, climate metrics, reliability, and applicability. Drawing upon this analysis, future lines of research on this topic are delineated. ; This research was carried out as a part of the project EU-project FlyATM4E. FlyATM4E has received funding from the SESAR Joint Undertaking under the European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under grant agreement No 891317. The JU receives support from the European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme and the SESAR JU members other than the Union.