Suchergebnisse

"Propaganda is a subjective information primarily used to influence an audience and further a political agenda. In China, it has a long history but has been most effective in modern society. What exactly is propaganda? Why does it exist and why does the public tolerate it? The book answers these questions by tracing back to the emergence and development of integrated propaganda and scientific propaganda. On the basis of that, it focuses on the emergence of propaganda concept in China, the establishment of Kuomintang and the Communist Party of China's propaganda concept, intellectuals and propaganda, debate on propaganda concept in China after 1949 as well as the emergence of Propaganda 3.0 that coordinates integrated propaganda and scientific propaganda. Setting propaganda under the framework of modernity, the book explains how different groups have legitimatized propaganda since the 20th century. From a reasonable and neutral standpoint, the author describes the confrontation among various propaganda concepts and discourses, displaying a panorama of the mutual conflicts between nation and individuals, control and freedom, ideas and bodies. Not only will scholars and students studying journalism and communication find this book interesting, professionals working in journalism, advertisement, public relations and publicity will also find it readable and enlightening"--

"Flexible time" as a myth in platform labor has been destructed by critical media scholars. However, while previous studies have answered the question of what platform time "isn't," most failed to go further in analyzing what "it is." Based on the 6-month fieldwork, this study aims to re-construct the temporal politics of platform labor in the online food delivery industry in China. Specifically, we employ an inherently relational perspective to analyze three differential temporal themes constructed by heterogeneous actors, namely the "daily time" by third-party subcontractor, "event time" by platform, and "poaching time" by rider. In the investigation of multiple temporalities, this article also uncovers the asymmetrical "relational balancing" among heterogeneous actors in platform labor.

Artificial intelligence (AI) agency plays an important role in shaping humans' perceptions and evaluations of AI. This study seeks to conceptually differentiate AI agency from human agency and examine how AI's agency manifested on source and language dimensions may be associated with humans' perceptions of AI. A 2 (AI's source autonomy: autonomous vs human-assisted) × 2 (AI's language subjectivity: subjective vs objective) × 2 (topics: traveling vs reading) factorial design was adopted ( N = 376). The results showed autonomous AI was rated as more trustworthy, and AI using subjective language was rated as more trustworthy and likable. Autonomous AI using subjective language was rated as the most trustworthy, likable, and of the best quality. Participants' AI literacy moderated the interaction effect of source autonomy and language subjectivity on human trust and chat quality evaluation. Results were discussed in terms of human–AI communication theories and the design and development of AI chatbots.