The Semantic Equivalence Between the Good and the Right: Its Support for and Challenge to Consequentialism
In: Fudan Journal of the humanities & social sciences, Band 15, Heft 4, S. 463-473
ISSN: 2198-2600
17 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: Fudan Journal of the humanities & social sciences, Band 15, Heft 4, S. 463-473
ISSN: 2198-2600
In: Fudan Journal of the humanities & social sciences, Band 15, Heft 2, S. 247-258
ISSN: 2198-2600
In: Fudan Journal of the humanities & social sciences, Band 13, Heft 3, S. 301-314
ISSN: 2198-2600
In: Fudan Journal of the humanities & social sciences, Band 12, Heft 2, S. 275-291
ISSN: 2198-2600
In: Fudan Journal of the humanities & social sciences, Band 10, Heft 2, S. 179-192
ISSN: 2198-2600
In: Journal of Chinese political science, Band 15, Heft 3, S. 245-256
ISSN: 1874-6357
In: Fudan Journal of the humanities & social sciences, Band 7, Heft 1, S. 21-32
ISSN: 2198-2600
In: Materials and design, Band 224, S. 111319
ISSN: 1873-4197
In: Ecotoxicology and environmental safety: EES ; official journal of the International Society of Ecotoxicology and Environmental safety, Band 241, S. 113785
ISSN: 1090-2414
In: Ecotoxicology and environmental safety: EES ; official journal of the International Society of Ecotoxicology and Environmental safety, Band 184, S. 109616
ISSN: 1090-2414
In: Materials and design, Band 156, S. 470-479
ISSN: 1873-4197
In: Ecotoxicology and environmental safety: EES ; official journal of the International Society of Ecotoxicology and Environmental safety, Band 254, S. 114755
ISSN: 1090-2414
In: Fudan Journal of the humanities & social sciences
ISSN: 2198-2600
In: Fudan Journal of the humanities & social sciences, Band 12, Heft 4, S. 511-546
ISSN: 2198-2600
AbstractsThe paper focuses on the conceptualization and measurement of global justice and discusses theories, concepts, evaluative principles, and methodologies related to the study of global justice. In this paper, we seek to clarify how to conceptualize global justice, how conceptual indicators can be selected and justified by theories, and how those indicators can be conceptually consistent with the concept of global justice. Global justice is a broad concept that is composed of multi-level and multidimensional aspects belonging to both normative and empirical realities. A coherent and integrated theoretical framework that covers the normative basis and various empirical dimensions is therefore much needed in order to address some of the basic and important questions under study. The paper seeks to synthesize the multiple theories and conceptions of global justice that exist in the academic discourse and literature into three main theoretical approaches to global justice—rights based, good based, and virtue based. These three approaches are a good sample of and reflect well the strengths of the different theoretical, intellectual and cultural traditions at play in the study of global justice. From this perspective, the synthesis of the three approaches is meant to provide us with a coherent theoretical framework that serves as the normative basis and justifies the selection of indicators for measurement.
In: Materials and design, Band 228, S. 111851
ISSN: 1873-4197