The Impact of Textual Sentiment on Sovereign Bond Yield Spreads: Evidence from the Eurozone Crisis
In: Multinational Finance Journal, Band 18, Heft 3/4, S. 215-248
22 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: Multinational Finance Journal, Band 18, Heft 3/4, S. 215-248
SSRN
In: Multinational Finance Journal, Forthcoming
SSRN
In: International Review of Financial Analysis, Forthcoming
SSRN
In: Economics Letters, Band 213, Heft 110363
SSRN
In: Habitat international: a journal for the study of human settlements, Band 37, S. 155-162
In: Environmental science and pollution research: ESPR, Band 30, Heft 3, S. 5634-5661
ISSN: 1614-7499
In: Environmental science and pollution research: ESPR, Band 29, Heft 42, S. 63859-63885
ISSN: 1614-7499
In: Environmental science and pollution research: ESPR, Band 29, Heft 31, S. 47772-47799
ISSN: 1614-7499
SSRN
In: Journal of Corporate Finance, 37 (2016), 152-172
SSRN
In: JCOMP-D-21-02044
SSRN
In: Habitat international: a journal for the study of human settlements, Band 142, S. 102947
In: Computers and electronics in agriculture: COMPAG online ; an international journal, Band 202, S. 107345
In: AHURI Final Report 2022
SSRN
In: Urban studies
ISSN: 1360-063X
Suburbs are at the forefront of urban change, with urban policy looking to increase the density of suburban centres. Thus, the compact city has emerged as a dominant urban policy paradigm, where policy settings are configured to enable densification in designated centres. For some, this is a form of post-suburbanism, characterised by new drivers, experiences and outcomes of suburban redevelopment pressures. However, suburban densification can emerge as a site of contestation as diverse interests, such as residents, developers and governments, come together. We explore three suburban centres in Sydney, Australia, to identify the diverse array of resident positions, objectives and strategies that emerge in response to suburban densification. Drawing from literature on NIMBY (not-in-my-backyard), YIMBY (yes-in-my-backyard) and urban growth machines, we establish an analytical framework that disrupts simple pro- and anti-development positions, identifying five resident groups: supporters; resisters; opponents; expansionists; and beneficiaries.