The Consensus Method of Interpretation by the Inter-American Court of Human Rights
In: 3(1) Canadian Journal of Comparative and Contemporary Law 65-95 (2019)
122 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: 3(1) Canadian Journal of Comparative and Contemporary Law 65-95 (2019)
SSRN
In: 8(1) Cambridge International Law Journal 60-83 (2019)
SSRN
In: Chapter 2 in International Heritage Law for Communities: Exclusion and Re-Imagination (Oxford University Press, 2019)
SSRN
In: Chapter 3 in International Heritage Law for Communities: Exclusion and Re-Imagination (Oxford University Press, 2019)
SSRN
In: Chapter 5 in International Heritage Law for Communities: Exclusion and Re-Imagination (Oxford University Press, 2019)
SSRN
In: in Rainer Grote, Frauke Lachenmann and Rüdiger Wolfrum (eds.), Max Planck Encyclopedia of Comparative Constitutional Law (Oxford University Press, 2019)
SSRN
In: in Hélène Ruiz Fabri (ed.), Max Planck Encyclopedia of International Procedural Law (Oxford University Press, 2019)
SSRN
In: in Rainer Grote, Frauke Lachenmann and Rüdiger Wolfrum (eds.), Max Planck Encyclopedia of Comparative Constitutional Law (Oxford University Press, 2019)
SSRN
In: Chapter 4 in International Heritage Law for Communities: Exclusion and Re-Imagination (Oxford University Press, 2019)
SSRN
In: Chapter 9 in International Heritage Law for Communities: Exclusion and ReImagination (Oxford University Press, 2019)
SSRN
In: International journal of cultural property, Band 25, Heft 4, S. 469-490
ISSN: 1465-7317
Abstract:This article focuses on the issue of framing of food in international law, as a means to highlight the specific dimensions of food that are the focus of food as heritage under the 2003 Convention for the Safeguarding of the Intangible Cultural Heritage. The specific example of Mexican traditional cuisine is used as a prism through which to analyze regulatory choices across a range of organizations in the United Nations System, yielding a number of frames: food as heritage, food as a human right, food as indigeneity, food as biodiversity, and food as a regulatory object. The frames are natural consequences of the mandates of the bodies addressing food, and the article argues that food as heritage needs to be more clearly engaged with other dimensions of food in international law, lest food becomes just a tourist attraction under the intangible heritage regime.
In: The Canadian yearbook of international law: Annuaire canadien de droit international, Band 55, S. 1-32
ISSN: 1925-0169
AbstractThis article proposes a new model for the engagement of sub-state units with the international legal order. "Trialogical subsidiarity" acknowledges that some areas are best regulated locally, but it also argues that international law has an increasing say in areas traditionally reserved for local law. The implementation of an international cultural heritage treaty by constituent units (CUs) in federal states, despite objections of the federal authorities, is a case study for the possibilities and implications of the use of international law by CUs without the filtering of the central state. This use enhances the legitimacy of international law and can lead to better outcomes for local populations, moving international law closer to its promise of being a law of peoples rather than of states.
In: in Glenn Hooper (ed.), Heritage at the Interface: Interpretation and Identity (University Press of Florida, 2018) 121-135
SSRN
In: in Natsuko Akagawa and Laurajane Smith (eds.), Safeguarding Intangible Heritage: Practices and Politics (Routledge, 2018) 54-67
SSRN
In: Lucas Lixinski, 'Limiting Freedom of Assembly Based on Harm to Third Parties: The Balancing of Economic Freedoms and Fundamental Rights in the European Union', in András Sajó (ed.), Free to Protest: Constituent Power and Street Demonstration (Eleven Publishing, 2008)
SSRN