Suchergebnisse

With the volume Constitutional Documents of Italy and Malta 1787-1850 , the collected and annotated Italian constitutional documents of this epoch are now available for the first time. This publication contains over 150 Italian constitutional documents, beginning with the pre-revolutionary constitutional projects of Tuscany (Pietro Leopoldo Stati, 1787) and ending with the draft constitutions for the Kingdom of Lombardy-Venice (Statuto Costituzionale del Regno Lombardo-Veneto, 1850), published here for the first time. The first of two part-volumes contains the national constitutions and, in al

With the volume Constitutional Documents of Italy and Malta 1787-1850, the collected and annotated Italian constitutional documents of this epoch are now available for the first time. This publication contains 135 Italian constitutional documents, beginning with the pre-revolutionary constitutional projects of Tuscany (Pietro Leopoldo Stati, 1787) and ending with the draft constitutions for the Kingdom of Lombardy-Venice (Statuto Costituzionale del Regno Lombardo-Veneto, 1850), published here for the first time. The second of two part-volumes contains, in alphabetical order, the regional const

URL del artículo en la web de la Revista: https://www.upo.es/revistas/index.php/lex_social/article/view/3483 ; Il testo, contributo a un convegno organizzato da Massimo La Torre a Catanzaro nel giugno 2017 propone un minimo di idealismo per il futuro dei diritti umani sociali nell¿UE. Si parte dai rischi di esauribilità di tolleranza e solidarietà che minacciano l¿universalità dei diritti. Per affrontare le sfide opposte del fondamentalismo e del nichilismo dei diritti, occorre prendere sul serio il dovere di mitezza come precondizione morale dei principi e valori fondamentali della costituzione dai quali derivano gli altri doveri costituzionali. La lunga storia costituzionale di tolleranza e solidarietà non finisce oggi. Il graduabile dovere di solidarietà offre garanzie multilevel alla sostenibilità dei diritti. In particolare, il nuovo Pilastro Europeo dei Diritti Sociali offre un¿opportunità di rafforzamento della solidarietà sociale europea che potrebbe essere necessario per il consolidamento del Fiscal compact. Un minimo di ottimismo porta a concludere che i diritti umani non possono non essere anche diritti sociali e che i diritti sociali non possono non essere anche diritti umani ; The paper, contribution to a congress organized by Massimo La Torre in Catanzaro in June 2017, proposes a minimum of idealism for the future of social human rights within the EU. Starting point is that risks of exhausted tolerance and solidarity seem to undermine the universality of human rights as a basis of the European fundamental rights discourse. Fundamentalism and nihilism need to be faced by taking more seriously the duty of meekness as a moral precondition of the fundamental principles and values of the constitution that imply other constitutional duties. The long constitutional history of tolerance and solidarity is not yet finished. The gradual duty of solidarity grants multilevel guarantees to the sustainability of the social human rights. The new Social Rights Pillar of the EU could offer an opportunity for strengthening European social solidarity that could be necessary and required for the consolidation of the Fiscal compact. A minimum of optimism brings to the conclusion that human rights need to be also social rights and social rights need to be also human rights. ; Universidad Pablo de Olavide

The social part of market economy is played by social rights interacting with economic and cultural rights. The gap between the great ideals of social justice and a reality of these "weak rights" protected by weakened states is the subject of a worldwide political and legal drama. European and Indian social rights discourses are linked by international human rights law and common traditions of social constitutionalism, but face extremely different realities. Starting with a comparative contextual analysis, the paper outlines the concept and common "spirit" of social rights as a thin, neither neoliberal nor socialist synthesis and hybridisation of national constitutional and international law. Comparing the European and the SAARC Social Charter, changing welfare systems can learn from each other. The new EU social rights pillar has to preserve federal diversity. The Indian invention of a right to sleep could include a right to have dreams and the hope that social rights will not remain sleeping rights. --- La partie sociale de l'économie de marché est intégrée par les droits sociaux qui interagissent avec les droits économiques et culturels. La distance entre les grands idéals de justice sociale et la réalité de ces droits faibles protégés par États faibles est l'objet d'un débat international, politique et légal. Les droits sociaux européens et indiens sont liés par le droit international des droits humains et par les traditions communes du constitutionalisme social, mais ils doivent faire face aux réalités vraiment différentes. Á partir de une analyse comparée et contextuelle, l'article souligne le concept et l'esprit commun des droits sociaux qui sont une subtile, ni néolibérale ni socialiste, synthèse et hybridation de droit constitutionnel national et droit international. Comparer les chartes sociales européen, SAARC, systèmes d`aide sociale changeants ont la possibilité de apprendre l'un de l'autre. Le nouveau pillier européen des droits sociaux doit préserver la diversité fédérale. La création indienne du droit à dormir pourrait inclure un droit à rêver et l'espoir que les droits sociaux ne resteront pas des droits dormants.

The social part of market economy is played by social rights interacting with economic and cultural rights. The gap between the great ideals of social justice and a reality of these ¿weak rights¿ protected by weakened states is the subject of a worldwide political and legal drama. European and Indian social rights discourses are linked by international human rights law and common traditions of social constitutionalism, but face extremely different realities. Starting with a comparative contextual analysis, the paper outlines the concept and common ¿spirit¿ of social rights as a thin, neither neoliberal nor socialist synthesis and hybridisation of national constitutional and international law. Comparing the European and the SAARC Social Charter, changing welfare systems can learn from each other. The new EU social rights pillar has to preserve federal diversity. The Indian invention of a right to sleep could include a right to have dreams and the hope that social rights will not remain sleeping rights. --- La partie sociale de l'économie de marché est intégrée par les droits sociaux qui interagissent avec les droits économiques et culturels. La distance entre les grands idéals de justice sociale et la réalité de ces droits faibles protégés par États faibles est l'objet d'un débat international, politique et légal. Les droits sociaux européens et indiens sont liés par le droit international des droits humains et par les traditions communes du constitutionalisme social, mais ils doivent faire face aux réalités vraiment différentes. Á partir de une analyse comparée et contextuelle, l'article souligne le concept et l'esprit commun des droits sociaux qui sont une subtile, ni néolibérale ni socialiste, synthèse et hybridation de droit constitutionnel national et droit international. Comparer les chartes sociales européen, SAARC, systèmes d`aide sociale changeants ont la possibilité de apprendre l'un de l'autre. Le nouveau pillier européen des droits sociaux doit préserver la diversité fédérale. La création indienne du droit à dormir pourrait inclure un droit à rêver et l'espoir que les droits sociaux ne resteront pas des droits dormants. ; Artículo revisado por pares