Suchergebnisse
Filter
16 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
Wall Street in transition: the emerging system and its impact on the economy
In: The Charles C. Moskowitz lectures 15
How the structure of universities determined the fate of American legal education – A tribute to Larry Ribstein
In: International review of law and economics, Band 38, S. 107-116
ISSN: 0144-8188
SSRN
In defense of the corporate coup: why mergers make market work better
In: Reason: free minds and free markets, Band 15, S. 51-53
ISSN: 0048-6906
Book Review:Economic Factors in the Growth of Corporation Giving. Ralph L. Nelson
In: The journal of business, Band 44, Heft 4, S. 452
ISSN: 1537-5374
What's so Bad about Insider Trading?
In: Challenge: the magazine of economic affairs, Band 15, Heft 3, S. 14-42
ISSN: 1558-1489
Mergers and the Market for Corporate Control
In: Journal of political economy, Band 73, Heft 4, S. 351-351
ISSN: 1537-534X
Mergers and the Market for Corporate Control
In: Journal of political economy, Band 73, Heft 2, S. 110-120
ISSN: 1537-534X
Corporate Responsibility, Business Motivation, and Reality
In: The annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, Band 343, Heft 1, S. 55-64
ISSN: 1552-3349
There is a growing belief that the traditional separation of the private and public sectors of our society is becoming blurred. Corporate theorists have offered a variety of philosophies to replace the discarded notions of market constraints. The school of business statesmanship, for which Professor Adolf Berle is the most articulate spokesman, looks to business executives to fulfill corporate responsibilities other than those traditionally owed to shareholders. Corporate man agers, too, have voiced their acceptance of this new role, but the realities of business and politics belie their stated motiva tions for many allegedly altruistic acts. And, although the evi dence is not clear, the discernible pattern of individual incen tives and restraints suggests the same conclusion. The alleged acts of corporate statesmanship do not actually represent basic changes in the nature of American enterprise. It is more likely that they indicate the political vulnerability of industry today and the extent to which governments use both the car rot and stick to gain desired results from business. The ac quiescence of corporate leaders in the philosophy of business responsibility could ultimately result in the enforcement of such notions as legal obligations.
CORPORATE RESPONSIBILITY, BUSINESS MOTIVATION, AND REALITY
In: The annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, Band 343, S. 55-64
ISSN: 0002-7162
There is a growing belief that the traditional separation of the private & public sectors of our society is becoming blurred. Corporate theorists have offered a variety of philosophies to replace the discarded notions of market constraints. The Sch of business statesmanship, for which A. Berle is the most articulate spokesman, looks to business executives to fulfill corporate responsibilities other than those traditionally owed to shareholders. Corporate managers, too, have voiced their acceptance of this new role, but the realities of business & politics belie their stated motivations for many allegedly altruistic acts. Although the evidence is not clear, the discernible pattern of individual incentives & restraints suggest the same conclusion. The alleged acts of corporate statesmanship do not actually represent basic changes in the nature of Amer enterprise. It is more likely that they indicate the pot vulnerability of industry today & the extent to which gov's use both the carrot & stick to gain desired results from business. The acquiescence of corporate leaders in the philosophy of business responsibility could ultimately result in the enforcement of such notions as legal obligations. AA.
Economic mysteries in insider trading: Vortrag vor dem Europainstitut der Universität des Saarlandes, Saarbrücken, den 28. Oktober 1991
In: Vorträge, Reden und Berichte aus dem Europa-Institut Nr. 240
The modern corporation and social responsibility
In: Rational debate series, 6th ser., 3