Suchergebnisse

IN THIS ARTICLE, MILNE CONCLUDES THAT CO-OPERATIVE REPUBLIC MAY NOT BE A FULLY DEVELOPED IDEOLOGY, BUT THAT IT IS MORE THAN A MERE SLOGAN. FROM AN ANALYTIC POINT OF VIEW, IT MAY BE LOOKED AT FROM TWO ASPECTS, THE FIRST "NON-RACIAL", THE SECOND TAKING ACCOUNT OF RACE. FROM THE FIRST ANGLE IT REPRESENTS AN ATTEMPT TO ENCOURAGE QUALITIES LACKING IN DEVELOPING COUNTRIES.

Privatizing Malaysia: Rents, Rhetoric, Realities edited by K. S. Jomo.

Nationalism and Ethnicity in Southeast Asia edited by Ingrid Wessel.

THE CONCEPT OF A GROWTH TRIANGLE HAS EVOKED CONSIDERABLE INTEREST IN THE REGION. IN ORDER TO UNDERSTAND THE NATURE OF THE TRIANGLE, THIS ARTICLE SEEKS THE ANSWERS TO THE FOLLOWING QUESTIONS: HOW WERE SINGAPORE'S INTERESTS SERVED BY ITS DECISION TO BUILD UP THE ESTABLISHED LINKS IN THE AREA? HOW DID THE TRIANGLE SCHEME FIT IN WITH, OR EVEN ENHANCE, SINGAPORE'S ECONOMIC AND SECURITY STRATEGIES? WHAT BENEFITS WERE IN PROSPECT FOR MALAYSIA AND INDONESIA WHICH WOULD BE SUFFICIENTLY ATTRACTIVE TO THEM TO SECURE THEIR COOPERATION? WHY DID OBSTACLES ARISE IN JOHOR WHICH WERE LESS EVIDENT IN RIAU? WHAT ARE THE TRIANGLE'S FUTURE PROSPECTS, AND WHAT COMPETITION DOES IT FACE? WHAT ARE THE PROSPECTS FOR THE TRIANGLE CONCEPT'S BEING SUCCESSFULLY ATTEMTPED ELSEWHERE IN THE REGION?

The last ten years have been marked by the adoption of privatization policies by governments in the ASEAN states with the exception of Brunei. The purpose of the article is to consider the pattern of privatization in the countries, not primarily as regards the organizational forms which it assumes, but, rather, with reference to the "recipients" and their links to the allocators. (DÜI-Sen)