The political developments in 'Iraq leading up to the rising in the spring of 1935
In: Journal of the Royal Central Asian Society, Band 23, S. 27-44
ISSN: 0035-8789
52 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: Journal of the Royal Central Asian Society, Band 23, S. 27-44
ISSN: 0035-8789
In: Edited version published in 'The Weekend Australian' (18 April 2020: Sydney)
SSRN
Working paper
In: XII Gijon Conference on Sports Economics, May 2017
SSRN
International humanitarian law ("IHL"), or the law of armed conflict ("LOAC"), is a branch of international law designed to regulate the conduct of belligerent states during an armed conflict. [1] However, conflicts in the modern era are drastically different than the interstate hostilities envisioned at the time the bulk of IHL was developed. Contemporary conflicts, such as the 'War on Terror' between states and non-state actors, have resulted in new military tactics to address the complications inherent in these modern conflicts. The controversial use of targeted killing is amongst these new tactics. For the purposes of this discussion, targeted killing is the "intentional slaying of a specific alleged terrorist or group of alleged terrorists undertaken with explicit governmental approval where they cannot be arrested using reasonable means." [2] The inability to arrest suspected terrorists reflects the transnational aspect to these conflicts as the victim state is unable to exert enforcement jurisdiction beyond its borders. [3] Until such time as new international norms develop to specifically address targeted killing, the legality of this tactic must be assessed against existing IHL. Under contemporary IHL, targeted killing is lawful although highly circumscribed. ; Publisher PDF
BASE
In: Labour & industry: a journal of the social and economic relations of work, Band 22, Heft 4, S. 447-464
ISSN: 2325-5676
In: Journal of terrorism research: TR, Band 2, Heft 3
ISSN: 2049-7040
International humanitarian law ("IHL"), or the law of armed conflict ("LOAC"), is a branch of international law designed to regulate the conduct of belligerent states during an armed conflict. [1] However, conflicts in the modern era are drastically different than the interstate hostilities envisioned at the time the bulk of IHL was developed. Contemporary conflicts, such as the 'War on Terror' between states and non-state actors, have resulted in new military tactics to address the complications inherent in these modern conflicts. The controversial use of targeted killing is amongst these new tactics. For the purposes of this discussion, targeted killing is the "intentional slaying of a specific alleged terrorist or group of alleged terrorists undertaken with explicit governmental approval where they cannot be arrested using reasonable means." [2] The inability to arrest suspected terrorists reflects the transnational aspect to these conflicts as the victim state is unable to exert enforcement jurisdiction beyond its borders. [3] Until such time as new international norms develop to specifically address targeted killing, the legality of this tactic must be assessed against existing IHL. Under contemporary IHL, targeted killing is lawful although highly circumscribed.
BASE
In: Environmental claims journal, Band 20, Heft 1, S. 54-61
ISSN: 1547-657X
SSRN
Working paper
In: SMAANZ Newsletter, No. 5, 5-7 (2002)
SSRN
In: Seminar Paper, Department of Management & Accounting, La Trobe University, Melbourne, 31 August 2000
SSRN
Working paper
In: Journal of Latin American studies, Band 5, Heft 2, S. 306-308
ISSN: 1469-767X