Straipsniai: Skurdo veiksnys Lietuvos politikoje
In: Politologija, Heft 29, S. 23-59
ISSN: 1392-1681
11 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: Politologija, Heft 29, S. 23-59
ISSN: 1392-1681
In: European studies on inequalities and social cohesion, Heft 3, S. 57-71
ISSN: 1734-6878
In: European studies on inequalities and social cohesion, Heft 1-2, S. 137-150
ISSN: 1734-6878
In: European studies on inequalities and social cohesion, Heft 1-2, S. 135-168
ISSN: 1734-6878
In: European studies on inequalities and social cohesion, Heft 3-4, S. 131-142
ISSN: 1734-6878
The aim of this paper is to reveal how the collaboration process mobilise resources among countries with different logics of welfare, yet address similar problems of ageing society, i a caring, a learning and a political perspective. The study draws on social science theories and the analysis is based on qualitative empirical data from an interdisciplinary field. The main conclusion is that a multi-dimensional understanding of dementia care by shared knowledge of different welfare logics adds value to experiences of cross-border learning. A social innovation model is presented.
BASE
The aim of this paper is to reveal how the collaboration processes mobilise resourcesamong countries with different logics of welfare, yet address similar problems of ageingsociety, in a caring, learning and political perspective. The study draws on social sciencetheories and the analysis is based on qualitative empirical data from an interdisciplinaryfield. The main conclusion is that a multi-dimensional understanding of dementia careby shared knowledge of different welfare logics adds value to experiences of crossborderlearning. A social innovation model is presented.
BASE
The aim of this paper is to reveal how the collaboration processes mobilise resources among countries with different logics of welfare, yet address similar problems of ageing society, in a caring, learning and political perspective. The study draws on social science theories and the analysis is based on qualitative empirical data from an interdisciplinary field. The main conclusion is that a multi-dimensional understanding of dementia care by shared knowledge of different welfare logics adds value to experiences of cross-border learning. A social innovation model is presented.
BASE
The aim of this paper is to reveal how the collaboration processes mobilise resources among countries with different logics of welfare, yet address similar problems of ageing society, in a caring, learning and political perspective. The study draws on social science theories and the analysis is based on qualitative empirical data from an interdisciplinary field. The main conclusion is that a multi-dimensional understanding of dementia care by shared knowledge of different welfare logics adds value to experiences of cross-border learning. A social innovation model is presented.
BASE
The aim of this paper is to reveal how the collaboration processes mobilise resources among countries with different logics of welfare, yet address similar problems of ageing society, in a caring, learning and political perspective. The study draws on social science theories and the analysis is based on qualitative empirical data from an interdisciplinary field. The main conclusion is that a multi-dimensional understanding of dementia care by shared knowledge of different welfare logics adds value to experiences of cross-border learning. A social innovation model is presented.
BASE
The aim of this paper is to reveal how the collaboration processes mobilise resources among countries with different logics of welfare, yet address similar problems of ageing society, in a caring, learning and political perspective. The study draws on social science theories and the analysis is based on qualitative empirical data from an interdisciplinary field. The main conclusion is that a multi-dimensional understanding of dementia care by shared knowledge of different welfare logics adds value to experiences of cross-border learning. A social innovation model is presented.
BASE