Suchergebnisse

This research explored the usage of activity codes introduced into the International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems, Tenth revision, Australian Modification (ICD-10-AM) Third Edition and examined the data quality of activity coding, explicitly, completeness and specificity. Injury separations for years 2001/02 to 2005/06 specifying a 'true injury' were extracted for descriptive analyses. Part A investigated the usage of activity codes and compared the usage of the 236 activity codes available in the Activity block (U50-U73) present in the ICD-10-AM Third Edition against the 16 codes present in the second edition. Part B examined the level of completeness of external cause coding and the degree of activity coding specificity in the 2005/06 dataset. It was found that the additional activity codes were used extensively with only 46 codes seldom assigned. Codes present in the second edition were extensively used in the third and fourth editions and the new additional activity codes represent 10% of all activity codes assigned per year. All five datasets demonstrated high levels of completeness, recording completeness levels greater than 97%, where missing activity codes attributed to the majority of missing codes. Fourteen out of the 24 activity categories demonstrated a strong reliance on non-specific codes and Team ball sports and Wheeled non-motor sports illustrated that activity codes assigned lacked detail in the code. Clinicians and coders need to acknowledge the importance of quality clinical documentation for research and policy-making purposes so that circumstances surrounding injury events can be coded to the highest level of specificity to improve injury prevention and control activities. Missing activity codes and the abundance of non-specific coding hinders the usefulness of the data.

Background International studies of the health of Indigenous and tribal peoples provide important public health insights. Reliable data are required for the development of policy and health services. Previous studies document poorer outcomes for Indigenous peoples compared with benchmark populations, but have been restricted in their coverage of countries or the range of health indicators. Our objective is to describe the health and social status of Indigenous and tribal peoples relative to benchmark populations from a sample of countries. Methods Collaborators with expertise in Indigenous health data systems were identified for each country. Data were obtained for population, life expectancy at birth, infant mortality, low and high birthweight, maternal mortality, nutritional status, educational attainment, and economic status. Data sources consisted of governmental data, data from non-governmental organisations such as UNICEF, and other research. Absolute and relative differences were calculated. Findings Our data (23 countries, 28 populations) provide evidence of poorer health and social outcomes for Indigenous peoples than for non-Indigenous populations. However, this is not uniformly the case, and the size of the rate difference varies. We document poorer outcomes for Indigenous populations for: life expectancy at birth for 16 of 18 populations with a difference greater than 1 year in 15 populations; infant mortality rate for 18 of 19 populations with a rate difference greater than one per 1000 livebirths in 16 populations; maternal mortality in ten populations; low birthweight with the rate difference greater than 2% in three populations; high birthweight with the rate difference greater than 2% in one population; child malnutrition for ten of 16 populations with a difference greater than 10% in five populations; child obesity for eight of 12 populations with a difference greater than 5% in four populations; adult obesity for seven of 13 populations with a difference greater than 10% in four populations; educational attainment for 26 of 27 populations with a difference greater than 1% in 24 populations; and economic status for 15 of 18 populations with a difference greater than 1% in 14 populations. Interpretation We systematically collated data across a broader sample of countries and indicators than done in previous studies. Taking into account the UN Sustainable Development Goals, we recommend that national governments develop targeted policy responses to Indigenous health, improving access to health services, and Indigenous data within national surveillance systems.