Contested places
In: University of Southern Denmark studies in history and social sciences 469
13 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: University of Southern Denmark studies in history and social sciences 469
At the turn of the 20th century, the small central Texas town ofGonzales saw an impressive population increase consisting primarilyof Anglo Americans from other parts of the United States and ofMexican Americans. The latter constituted a new ethnic community ina town of Anglo Americans and African Americans. The powerrelationship between these two communities followed the norms andpractices of a southern racial hierarchy, and at least to some extent, thearrival of the Mexican Americans questioned the power logics of thisrelationship. The author argues that the activation in the first decadesof the 20th century of a series of historical references to Texas'independence in public space was part of an Anglo American effort tomaintain its economic, social and political power by integrating thenewly arrived Anglo Americans and efficiently excluding the MexicanAmerican community.
BASE
In: Scandinavian political studies, Band 28, Heft 1, S. 69-89
ISSN: 1467-9477
In: Scandinavian political studies: SPS ; a journal, Band 28, Heft 1, S. 69-90
ISSN: 0080-6757
In: Tidsskrift for velferdsforskning, Band 25, Heft 1, S. 1-15
ISSN: 2464-3076
In: Journal of Law and Society, Band 40, Heft 2, S. 228-248
SSRN
In: European Law Journal, Band 19, Heft 3, S. 325-339
SSRN
In: Tidsskrift for velferdsforskning, Band 24, Heft 1, S. 35-48
ISSN: 2464-3076
In: Tidsskrift for velferdsforskning, Band 22, Heft 3, S. 213-227
ISSN: 2464-3076
In: European journal of social security, Band 17, Heft 4, S. 409-435
ISSN: 2399-2948
As members of the Nordic family of welfare states, both Norway and Denmark are characterised by universal access to health care. Legislation and individual rights have increasingly been used as tools to promote and protect patients' equal access to health care services. At the same time both countries are struggling with increasing health care expenditures, waiting lists and a demand to prioritise health care resources in light of new and expensive treatment options. This calls for political space to adjust prioritisation policies and procedures. The article analyses the regulation of access to hospital care in Norway and Denmark, from a law and politics perspective. We explore similarities and differences between the two countries with respect to the objectives of the regulation and formulation of the right to hospital care, and how the interplay between law and politics – and juridification and politicisation – is expressed and managed in the regulation. We conclude that even though there are differences between the two countries in the extent of juridification, the regulation in both countries still leaves room for continued political governance of issues related to the prior itisation of health care services.
In: Edward Elgar essentials in social policy