Public sector unions, democracy, and citizenship at work
In: Labor history, Band 59, Heft 1, S. 38-53
ISSN: 1469-9702
21 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: Labor history, Band 59, Heft 1, S. 38-53
ISSN: 1469-9702
Public sector unions around the world are under threat from political forces. Combined, the financial crisis and austerity measures have challenged public sector unions' legitimacy. In the U.S., the postrecession assault on public sector unions is rooted in political ideology, with not only a widening polarization along the liberal-conservative spectrum playing a key role, but cultural cognition and economic downturn, too. This research provides a comparative historical analysis of changes in public sector collective bargaining rights at state and local levels in 50 states. The article describes the variations in public sector industrial relations at the state and local levels in the short and medium term. It also proposes a theoretical model to explain similar and diverging patterns which can be observed across the states. ; Gewerkschaften des öffentlichen Dienstes sehen weltweit ihre Legitimation in Frage gestellt und sind bedroht durch politische Gegner, die Finanzkrise und Sparmaßnahmen. In den USA wurzelt der Angriff auf die Gewerkschaften des öffentlichen Dienstes in politischer Ideologie, insbesondere der zunehmenden Polarisierung im liberal-konservativen Spektrum, dem Feld der kulturellen Kognition und des wirtschaftlichen Abschwungs. Der Beitrag liefert eine historisch-komparative Analyse der Veränderungen Rechte des collective bargaining im öffentlichen Dienst auf staatlicher und lokaler Ebene aller 50 Staaten der USA. Dabei werden die kurz- und mittelfristigen Veränderungen der industriellen Beziehungen des öffentlichen Dienstes auf staatlicher und lokaler Ebene beschrieben und darüber hinaus ein Modell zur Erklärung von Ähnlichkeiten und Abweichungen zwischen den Bundesstaaten vorgeschlagen.
BASE
In: Industrielle Beziehungen: Zeitschrift für Arbeit, Organisation und Management, Band 24, Heft 4, S. 450-471
ISSN: 1862-0035
Public sector unions around the world are under threat from political forces. Combined, the financial crisis and austerity measures have challenged public sector unions' legitimacy. In the U.S., the postrecession assault on public sector unions is rooted in political ideology, with not only a widening polarization along the liberal-conservative spectrum playing a key role, but cultural cognition and economic downturn, too. This research provides a comparative historical analysis of changes in public sector collective bargaining rights at state and local levels in 50 states. The article describes the variations in public sector industrial relations at the state and local levels in the short and medium term. It also proposes a theoretical model to explain similar and diverging patterns which can be observed across the states.
In: Journal of Collective Negotiations (formerly Journal of Collective Negotiations in the Public Sector), Band 30, Heft 4, S. 307-323
ISSN: 2167-7824
In: Journal of collective negotiations in the public sector, Band 30, Heft 4, S. 307-324
ISSN: 0047-2301
In: The American review of public administration: ARPA, Band 33, Heft 4, S. 423-448
ISSN: 1552-3357
Mediation is rapidly becoming the dispute resolution technique of choice in public administration. This researche xamines the ways in whichfeder al mediators approachdis pute resolution in labormanagement relations. The analyses are based on semistructured interviews that were conducted with 15 mediators at the Federal Mediation and Conciliation Service (FMCS). Mediators'descriptions of the mediation process are evaluated withr espect to three models: problem solving, transformative, and bifocal. Given the success of the FMCS at mediating a widening variety of disputes, the results of this study should generalize to other dispute resolution contexts. Practical implications of this research are as follows: (a) Mediators should adopt a bifocal approach, simultaneously attending to overarching relationship issues as well as the concrete, immediate issues in dispute; (b) the parties to a dispute must be actively engaged in the mediation process; (c) conflict resolution and collaborative problem solving is a long-term affair; and (d) public administrators involved in dispute resolution and collaborative problem solving should be prepared to take small steps.
In: American review of public administration: ARPA, Band 33, Heft 4, S. 423-448
ISSN: 0275-0740
In: International journal of public administration, Band 25, Heft 11, S. 1351-1377
ISSN: 1532-4265
In: International journal of public administration, Band 25, Heft 11, S. 1255-1266
ISSN: 1532-4265
In: International journal of public administration: IJPA, Band 25, Heft 11, S. 1255-1266
ISSN: 0190-0692
In: International journal of public administration: IJPA, Band 25, Heft 11, S. 1351-1378
ISSN: 0190-0692
In: Review of public personnel administration, Band 18, Heft 4, S. 55-67
ISSN: 1552-759X
In recent years, mediation has become increasingly popular as a means to resolve conflict. One important issue that arises out of the recent explosive growth in the practice of mediation is. what do mediators need to know in order to assist the parties in resolving their conflicts? This research attemtps to identify the determinants of mediator competence by examining the knowledge, skills and abilities of mediators in public sector labor relations. The research focuses on the core competencies requirements for mediators with the Federal Mediation and Conciliation Service and suggests which of the competencies may be applicable to mediation in other contexts.
In: Labor history, Band 62, Heft 3, S. 334-352
ISSN: 1469-9702
In: APSA 2013 Annual Meeting Paper
SSRN
Working paper
In: Public Human Resource Management: Problems and Prospects, 6th ed, Forthcoming
SSRN