Falling in with the wrong crowd: linkage in the age of populism$dBen Margulies
In: Canadian foreign policy journal: La politique étrangère du Canada, Band 25, Heft 1, S. 54-71
ISSN: 1192-6422
9 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: Canadian foreign policy journal: La politique étrangère du Canada, Band 25, Heft 1, S. 54-71
ISSN: 1192-6422
World Affairs Online
In: Canadian foreign policy: La politique étrangère du Canada, Band 25, Heft 1, S. 54-71
ISSN: 2157-0817
In: Journal of democracy, Band 29, Heft 1, S. 141-147
ISSN: 1045-5736
World Affairs Online
In: Journal of democracy, Band 29, Heft 1, S. 141-147
ISSN: 1086-3214
In: Comparative European politics, Band 14, Heft 6, S. 802-825
ISSN: 1740-388X
In: Comparative European politics: CEP, Band 14, Heft 6, S. 802-825
ISSN: 1472-4790
In the face of falling poll numbers, Donald Trump has argued that this year's election may be rigged, and also this week made a veiled threat towards Hillary Clinton by invoking the Second Amendment. But does Trump really mean everything he says? Probably not, writes Ben Margulies, who argues that Trump is merely redeploying existing Republican rhetoric more sharply and to bigger audiences. He argues that Trump's comments are designed to further develop his populist rhetoric, and to take control of the media agenda, something he needs to do given his recent polling.
BASE
In: Italian Political Science Review: Rivista italiana di scienza politica, Band 44, Heft 3, S. 267-297
ISSN: 0048-8402
This article is an overview of recent developments in the liberal party family. It examines the fortunes of the party family in selected countries. It presents a qualitative survey of certain selected new political parties, which are either too new or too obscure to have been formally classified, and/or which have not appeared in the Comparative Manifesto Project. The article provides arguments as to why these parties may be candidates for future inclusion in the liberal party family. It also examines Marie Demker's (2008) conception of the virtue party, a scheme for examining certain new political parties which overlaps with many traditional features of liberalism. Adapted from the source document.
In: International migration review: IMR, S. 019791832311721
ISSN: 1747-7379, 0197-9183
Scholarship at the intersection of migration studies and international relations has been increasingly interested in diasporas in world politics, yet analysis integrating relevant literature in systematic ways through rigorous empirical methods has been largely missing. How can mixed-methods techniques contribute to the evolution of a relatively new research program, such as the study of diaspora mobilizations in conflict processes? How can these techniques identify data patterns that could help establish meaningful analytical categories and factor in multi-sited complexity? Based on a large-scale European Research Council migration project "Diasporas and Contested Sovereignty," this Research Note offers a pathway for future scholarship on how to systematically do so. It presents a rich theoretically informed coding procedure that systematizes the analysis of four researchers working across conflict-generated diasporas in multiple host-countries and linked to conflicts in multiple countries of origin. Correspondence and cluster analyses are used to isolate profiles of diaspora entrepreneurs. Procedures used early in the project's life-cycle helped later to design a unique survey and inform a deeper comparative causal analysis, thus creating a coherent conversation among different research products.