Democracy in the Woods: Environmental Conservation and Social Justice in India, Tanzania, and Mexico
In: Global environmental politics, Band 17, Heft 4, S. 155-157
ISSN: 1536-0091
9 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: Global environmental politics, Band 17, Heft 4, S. 155-157
ISSN: 1536-0091
In: Politics, Groups, and Identities, Band 3, Heft 4, S. 697-702
ISSN: 2156-5511
In: Global environmental politics, Band 19, Heft 2, S. 38-60
ISSN: 1536-0091
Although Indigenous Peoples make significant contributions to global environmental governance and were prominent actors at the 2015 Paris Climate Summit, COP21, they remain largely invisible in conventional, mainstream, and academic accounts of COP21. In this article, we adopt feminist collaborative event ethnography to draw attention to often marginalized and unrecognized actors and help make visible processes that are often invisible in the study of power and influence at sites of global environmental governance. Specifically, we integrate current approaches to power from international relations and political ecology scholarship to investigate how Indigenous Peoples, critical actors for solving global environmental challenges, access, navigate, and cultivate power at COP21 to shape global environmental governance. Through conceptual and methodological innovations that illuminate how Indigenous Peoples overcome structural and spatial barriers to engagement, this article demonstrates how attention to the politics of representation through pluralistic approaches to power can help expand the repertoire of possibilities for advancing global environmental governance.
In: Annual Review of Environment and Resources, Band 38, S. 441-471
SSRN
In: Environmental politics, Band 24, Heft 6, S. 894-912
ISSN: 1743-8934
In: Environmental politics, Band 24, Heft 6, S. 894-19
ISSN: 0964-4016
In: Earth system governance, Band 10, S. 100121
ISSN: 2589-8116
This perspective identifies how recent advances contribute to re-evaluating and re-constructing global environmental negotiations as a research object by calling into question who constitutes an actor and what constitutes a site of agreement formation. Building on this scholarship, we offer the term agreement-making to facilitate further methodological and ethical reflection. The term agreement-making broadens the conceptualisation of the actors, sites and processes constitutive of global environmental agreements and brings to the fore how these are shaped by, reflect and have the potential to re-make or transform the intertwined global order of social, political and economic relations. Agreement-making situates research within these processes, and we suggest that enhancing the methodological diversity and practical utility is a potential avenue for challenging the reproduction of academic dominance. We highlight how COVID-19 requires further adapting research practices and offers an opportunity to question whether we need to be physically present to provide critical insight, analysis and support.
BASE
In: The annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, Band 700, Heft 1, S. 166-182
ISSN: 1552-3349
Despite decades of climate science research, existing climate actions have had limited impacts on mitigating climate change. Efforts to reduce emissions, for example, have yet to spur sufficient action to reduce the most severe effects of climate change. We draw from our experiences as Ojibwe knowledge holders and community members, scientists, and scholars to demonstrate how the lack of recognition of traditional knowledges (TK) within climate science constrains effective climate action and exacerbates climate injustice. Often unrecognized in science and policy arenas, TK generates insights into how justice-driven climate action, rooted in relational interdependencies between humans and older-than-human relatives, can provide new avenues for effectively addressing climate change. We conclude by arguing for a shift toward meaningful and respectful inclusion of plural knowledge systems in climate governance.