Suchergebnisse

El presente trabajo se orienta a desarrollar el criterio aplicado por los romanos con relación a las donaciones y mostrar como Vélez Sarsfield al legislar lo hizo junto a los contratos, ya que las entendía como tales, decisión que las descartaba de la parte correspondiente a las disposiciones de última voluntad como los testamentos. Siguió el criterio del Derecho Romano, alejándose del pensamiento del Derecho Francés, que las reglamentaron bajo un título común. El mismo criterio es seguido por el actual Código, el cual reformula la definición del contrato, remarcando la naturaleza jurídica de la donación como contrato. La diferencia de criterio que se encuentra en el nuevo Código con relación al Derecho Romano y lo fijado por Vélez es que se permite las donaciones entre cónyuges, y la opción de separación de bienes. Para una mayor comprensión de las donaciones, pasamos a un desarrollo histórico de su concepción. ; The present work is oriented to develop the criterion applied by the Romansin relation to the donations as well as to show how Velez Sarsfieldincluded them amongthe contracts, since he understood them like that. This decision resulted in removing the donations from the part corresponding to the last will dispositions such as the testaments. By doing this, he followedthe criterion of the Roman Law, moving away from the French Law,that regulated them under a common title. The same criterion is followed by the current Code, which recasts the definition of the contract, stressing the legal nature of thedonation as one of them. The difference of criterion found in the new Code in comparison withthe Roman law and what was legislated by Vélez, consists in that donations are allowed between spousesand in the option of separation of goods. For a greater understanding of the donations,we move to a historical development of its conception. ; Facultad de Ciencias Jurídicas y Sociales

This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 unported license available at http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ ; In a context of extension of copyright duration and scope, the public domain is at risk, and with it, the vibrant expression of our culture and democracies. A group of academic and think-tank researchers, librarians, government representatives, museum curators, copyright and human rights activists, information technology entrepreneurs and non-profits worked between 2007 and 2011 to understand the notion of the public domain. Often lacking a positive definition, this concept has been poorly represented in the public debate. The political scene, since the expansion of the Internet in the last couple of decades, has been giving a larger space to concepts of piracy, cybercriminality, technical protection, lawsuits and internet filtering, forgetting that lawful and peaceful creative activities can only take place if an unregulated space remains available around copyright protection.

The objective of this study is to analyze publication's evolution on the topic of client satisfaction using the Scopus database in the English language for the period 1954-2016. The methodology used in this paper is a literature review conducted on 2753 scientific articles and 156 journals. After establishing 100 top publications topics on client satisfaction, the contributors find that authors used almost the same methods of research and data collection. The main results demonstrate the increase of interest over the theme in different social and economic sciences, as well as in different countries. Important scientific journals also increase the number of publications on client satisfaction. Besides the high interest over this theme in the academia, the international literature reviews are still scarce. The approach, based on the construction of a database using a systematic selection process that was applied to the English language publications on social and economic science areas, is a valid tool that can be applied for literature reviews in all areas within social and economic sciences. To the contributors knowledge, the bibliometric analysis is applied for the first time on client satisfaction, so this is also a novel aspect of the paper to highlight.

Orbital motorways are major structuring elements in the metropolitan areas of developed countries. They can be considered as key components within the transport network of large urban agglomerations, funneling a great amount of intra- and inter-metropolitan traffic. This paper explores the equity and efficiency effects of orbital motorways on accessibility, using the beltways of Madrid as a case study. It is well known that orbital impacts differ depending on their location within the metropolitan area (inner and outer) as well as the activity distributional performance (agglomeration vs. decentralization of activities). These topics have received very little attention in previous studies. The paper extracts some policy considerations with respect to accessibility disparities within metropolitan areas and compares relative changes from the spatial perspective.