Introduction
In: The Oxford Handbook of the Political Economy of International Trade
102 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: The Oxford Handbook of the Political Economy of International Trade
In: Library of essays in international relations
In: Oxford handbooks online
In: Political science
'The Oxford Handbook of the Political Economy of International Trade' surveys the literature on the politics of international trade and highlights the most exciting recent scholarly developments. The handbook is focused on work by political scientists that draws extensively on work in economics, but is distinctive in its applications and attention to political features; that is, it takes politics seriously.
World Affairs Online
In: Oxford Handbooks
The Oxford Handbook of the Politics of International Trade surveys the literature on the politics of international trade and highlights the most exciting recent scholarly developments. The Handbook is focused on work by political scientists that draws extensively on work in economics, but is distinctive in its applications and attention to political features; that is, it takes politics seriously. The Handbook's framework is organized in part along the traditional lines of domestic society-domestic institutions - international interaction, but elaborates this basic framework to showcase the mos
From the refusal of the U.S. Congress to approve fast-track trade authority and certain foreign aid packages to the obstacles placed by Western European parliaments in the path of economic integration, legislatures often interfere with national leaders' efforts to reach and implement predictable international agreements. This seems to give an advantage to dictators, who can bluff with confidence and make decisions without consultation, and many assume that even democratic governments would do better to minimize political dissent and speak foreign policy from a single mouth. In this thoughtful, empirically grounded challenge to the assumption that messy domestic politics undermine democracies' ability to conduct international relations, Lisa Martin argues that legislatures--and particularly the apparently problematic openness of their proceedings--actually serve foreign policy well by giving credibility to the international commitments that are made. Examining the American cases of economic sanctions, the use of executive agreements versus treaties, and food assistance, in addition to the establishment of the European Union, Martin concludes that--if institutionalized--even rancorous domestic conversations between executives and legislatures augment rather than impede states' international dealings. Such interactions strengthen and legitimize states' bargaining positions and international commitments, increasing their capacity to realize international cooperation. By expanding our comprehension of how domestic politics affect international dialogue, this work is a major advance in the field of international relations and critical reading for those who study or forge foreign policy
In: Princeton paperbacks
In: Perspectives on politics, Band 22, Heft 1, S. 7-10
ISSN: 1541-0986
My presidential address is an attempt to connect two themes: my own work in the field of global governance and the theme of the 2023 APSA Annual Meeting, "Rights and Responsibilities in an Age of Mis- and Disinformation." Most work on disinformation focuses on domestic-level politics.1 However, I would argue that it also presents a major challenge to global governance, and research on disinformation on the international level deserves greater attention.
In: World politics: a quarterly journal of international relations
ISSN: 1086-3338
Modern international interactions are structured by institutions of global governance,
both formal and informal. Most of these institutions are encompassed by the liberal international order. Like domestic institutions, these international institutions are challenged
by the prevalence and depth of disinformation. The demand for disinformation, in turn,
has been fed by the order's lack of attention to growing domestic economic inequality.
Disinformation and inequality thus present twin challenges to global governance.
In: The review of international organizations, Band 16, Heft 1, S. 175-182
ISSN: 1559-744X
In: International theory: a journal of international politics, law and philosophy, Band 9, Heft 3, S. 353-380
ISSN: 1752-9727
As commitment devices, international institutions encourage cooperation by imposing costs on members who do not live up to their commitments. However, the costs that institutions can impose are limited, so that their commitment capacity is weak. Institutions can also impose costs as a condition of membership, allowing them to serve as costly signals. A model of weak commitment and costly signaling leads to a number of hypotheses about patterns of cooperation, institutional membership, and states' preferences over institutional design. For example, existing members of an institution should impose higher ex ante costs when a potential new member could either gain significant benefits from reneging on their commitments in the future, and when the new member expects to gain high benefits from future cooperation. These results are consistent with empirical work on institutions including peacekeeping and the World Trade Organization.
World Affairs Online
In: Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Politics
"Institutions and the Global Political Economy" published on by Oxford University Press.
In: Perspectives on politics, Band 14, Heft 2, S. 600-602
ISSN: 1541-0986
In: PS: political science & politics, Band 49, Heft 2, S. 313-319
ISSN: 1537-5935
ABSTRACTEvaluations of teaching effectiveness rely heavily on student evaluations of teaching. However, an accumulating body of evidence shows that these evaluations are subject to gender bias. Theories of leadership and role incongruity suggest that this bias should be especially prominent in large courses. This article examines publicly available data from two large political science departments and finds that female instructors receive substantively and significantly lower ratings than male instructors in large courses. The author discusses the implications of apparent gender bias in teaching evaluations for the professional success of female faculty. Findings of gender bias in evaluations in other fields also hold in political science and are particularly problematic in the evaluation of large courses.