Studies in Public Opinion: Attitudes, Nonattitudes, Measurement Error, and Change
In: Public opinion quarterly: journal of the American Association for Public Opinion Research, Band 70, Heft 1, S. 130-132
ISSN: 0033-362X
8 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: Public opinion quarterly: journal of the American Association for Public Opinion Research, Band 70, Heft 1, S. 130-132
ISSN: 0033-362X
In: Public opinion quarterly: journal of the American Association for Public Opinion Research, Band 70, Heft 1, S. 130-132
ISSN: 0033-362X
FrontMatter -- Acknowledgments -- Contents -- 1 Introduction -- 2 The Federal Household Survey System at a Crossroads -- 3 Sampling Frames -- 4 Collection of Household Data -- 5 End of Day 1: Discussant Remarks and Floor Discussion -- 6 Small-Area Estimation -- 7 Survey Content -- 8 Discussion and Next Steps -- References -- Appendix: Workshop Agenda -- Committee on National Statistics.
In: Journalism & mass communication quarterly: J&MCQ ; devoted to research in journalism and mass communication, Band 78, Heft 3, S. 484-502
ISSN: 1077-6990
In: Communication research, Band 31, Heft 1, S. 82-108
ISSN: 1552-3810
The increasing use of online news, particularly by young Americans, pointsto the importance of understanding what users learn from this form of news and whether features of online news encourage or discourage various types of learning. This experimental study demonstrates that online news that takes advantage of one of the key characteristics of the Web—the use of in-text hyperlinks—may actually discourage learning of the facts that make up many news stories. But this same linking structure apparently encourages those who commonly use the Web to have more densely interconnected knowledge structures for public affairs topics. However, those who rarely use the Webfor news do not gain such advantages and may even suffer disadvantages. These findings point to limitations in most past online news learning research, which has been limited to "just the facts" in its measurement of learning from the news.
FrontMatter -- Acknowledgments -- Contents -- Summary -- 1 Introduction -- 2 The Group Quarters Population and the American Community Survey -- 3 American Community Survey Data Products, Data Uses, and Data Needs -- 4 Sampling Frame Development and Maintenance -- 5 Sample Allocation and Selection -- 6 Weighting and Estimation -- References -- Appendix A: Participants in the Panel's Meeting with Data Users: December 13, 2010 -- Appendix B: 2011 American Community Survey: Housing Unit Questionnaire -- Appendix C: 2011 American Community Survey: Group Quarters Questionnaire -- Appendix D: 2005-2009 American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates Data Tables That Highlight the Group Quarters Population in Virginia -- Appendix E: 2005-2009 American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates Data Tables That Highlight the Group Quarters Population in Goochland County, Virginia -- Appendix F: The 10 Largest Federal Assistance Programs That Relied on ACS Total Population Estimates, Fiscal Year 2008 -- Appendix G: The 10 Largest Federal Assistance Programs with Funds Sent Directly to Substate Areas Based on ACS Total Population Estimates, Fiscal Year 2008 -- Appendix H: Plots of Relative Differences, ACS Estimates from 2005-2009, 2007-2009, and 2009 with Expected Estimates of the Group Quarters Population in U.S. States -- Appendix I: Plots of Relative Differences, 2005-2009 ACS Estimates and 2007 Expected Estimates of the Group Quarters Population in Selected Counties by Region -- Appendix J: Plots of Relative Differences, 2005-2009 ACS Estimates and 2007 Expected Estimates of the Group Quarters Population in Selected Areas with Populations Under 20,000 -- Appendix K: Biographical Sketches of Panel Members and Staff -- Committee on National Statistics.
Intro -- TITLE PAGE -- COPYRIGHT PAGE -- TABLE OF CONTENTS -- SUMMARY -- 1 INTRODUCTION -- History of the Minerva Research Initiative and Context for the Study -- Charge to the Committee -- 2 OVERVIEW OF THE COMMITTEE'S INFORMATION-GATHERING ACTIVITIES -- Reviews of Department of Defense and Other Public Records -- Interviews with Department of Defense Staff -- Grantee Survey -- Survey of Administrators of Sponsored Research at Academic Institutions -- Minerva Conference -- Public Information-Gathering Sessions -- Limitations of the Committee's Evaluation -- 3 PROCESSES OF THE MINERVA PROGRAM -- Overview of Program Processes -- Discussion of Minerva Program Processes -- 4 RESEARCH SUPPORTED BY THE MINERVA PROGRAM: QUANTITY AND QUALITY -- Review of Outputs of the Minerva Research Initiative Grants -- Stakeholder and Expert Perceptions of the Quality of Minerva Research -- Summary and Conclusions -- 5 DIRECTION AND VISION OF THE MINERVA PROGRAM -- Making Better Use of Minerva Research and Researchers -- Discussion of Minerva's Vision and Goals -- Increasing Social Scientists' Engagement with the Program -- Developing Benchmarks for Continuous Monitoring and Evaluation -- REFERENCES -- APPENDIXES -- A-1 2017 Preliminary Federal Obligations for Basic Research, by Agency and Field of Science and Engineering (dollars in thousands) -- A-2 2016 Federal Obligations for Basic Research Performed at Universities and Colleges in Social Sciences, by Selected Agency and Detailed Field (dollars in thousands) -- B Minerva Research Topics in Grant Announcements Issued between 2008 and 2018 -- C List of Minerva Grant Awards between 2009 and 2017 -- D Interview Protocol for Individual Interviews with Current and Former Minerva Research Initiative Staff -- E Survey of Minerva Grantees -- F Survey of Administrators of Sponsored Research.
In: Consensus study report
In: The National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, Medicine