Financial capital and banks in Hilferding and Sraffa: lessons for today
In: The European journal of the history of economic thought, Band 26, Heft 1, S. 51-80
ISSN: 1469-5936
16 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: The European journal of the history of economic thought, Band 26, Heft 1, S. 51-80
ISSN: 1469-5936
In: Mind & society: cognitive studies in economics and social sciences
ISSN: 1860-1839
AbstractPsychological observations are by now well integrated into economics, especially in the theory of finance, as can also be seen in the Nobel Prize awarded to Thaler. On the contrary, Simon's attempt to reforge economic theory on the paradigm of bounded rationality failed. Starting from the birth of the neoclassical paradigm, we'll describe the attempt to give it psychological foundations with a direct measurement of utility, then the axiomatic turn of the paradigm and its first anomalies. We'll then sum up the debate on rationality, taking place in the group of economists led by Simon, which brought to the rational expectations hypothesis. Finally, we'll discuss the development of behavioral economics and its progressive acceptance in economic theory. This historical reconstruction allows us to understand the actual hard core of the neoclassical paradigm and the growing need of the paradigm for practical flexibility that determines how to choose arguments, methods and evidence that can be useful to its development, including psychological ones.
SSRN
Working paper
In: Levy Economics Institute, Working Papers Series No. 972, 2020
SSRN
Working paper
SSRN
Working paper
The 2008 crisis created a need to rethink many aspects of economic theory, including the role of public intervention in the economy. On this issue, we explore the Barro-Ricardo equivalence, which has played a decisive role in molding the economic policies that fostered the crisis. We analyze the equivalence and its theoretical underpinnings, concluding that: (1) it declares, but then forgets, that it does not matter whether the nature of debt and investment is public or private; (2) its most problematic assumption is the representative agent hypothesis, which does not allow for an explanation of financialization and cannot assess dangers coming from high levels of financial leverage; (3) social wealth cannot be based on any micro-foundation and is linked to the role of the state as provider of financial stability; and (4) default is always the optimal policy for the government, and this remains true even when relaxing many equivalence assumptions. We go on to discuss possible solutions to high levels of public debt in the real world, inferring that no general conclusions are possible and every solution or mix of solutions must be tailored to each specific case. We conclude by connecting different solutions to the political balance of forces in the current era of financialization, using Italy (and, by extension, the eurozone) as a concrete example to better illustrate the discussion.
BASE
In: Journal of Economic Issues, Band 51, Heft - Issue 3
SSRN
In: Levy Economics Institute, Working Papers Series, No. 875
SSRN
Working paper
In: Government of the Italian Republic (Italy), Ministry of Economy and Finance, Department of the Treasury Working Paper No. 5
SSRN
In: Levy Economics Institute, Working Papers Series No. 855
SSRN
Working paper
In: World development: the multi-disciplinary international journal devoted to the study and promotion of world development, Band 96, S. 136-144
In: Sustainability
SSRN
SSRN
Working paper
In: Quaderni del Dipartimento di Politica Economica Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore Milano, 2019
SSRN
Since the 2008 crisis, the economics literature has shown a renewed interest in Keynes's "beauty contest" (BC) as a fundamental aspect of the functioning of financial markets. We argue that to understand the importance of the BC, psychological and informational factors are of small importance, and a dynamic-structural approach should be followed instead: the BC framework is paramount because it is rooted in the historical trajectory of capitalism and it is not simply a consequence of "irrational" (i.e., biased) agents. In this genuine form, the BC mechanism allows one to understand the main trends of a financialized world. Moreover, the conventional nature of financial markets provides a sound method for assessing different economic policies whose effectiveness depends on how much they can influence the convention itself. This alternative understanding of the BC can be used to start the needed rethinking of economics, urged by the crisis, that is for now reduced to studying the financial and psychological "imperfections" of the market.
BASE