Die folgenden Links führen aus den jeweiligen lokalen Bibliotheken zum Volltext:
Alternativ können Sie versuchen, selbst über Ihren lokalen Bibliothekskatalog auf das gewünschte Dokument zuzugreifen.
Bei Zugriffsproblemen kontaktieren Sie uns gern.
100 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: PRIO new security studies
In: PRIO new security studies
This book offers an examination of the role of emancipation in the study and practice of security, focusing on the issue of environmental change.The end of the Cold War created a context in which traditional approaches to security could be systematically questioned. This period also saw a concerted attempt in IR to argue that environmental change constituted a threat to security. This book argues that such a notion is problematic as it suggests that a universal definition of security is possible, which prevents a recognition of security as a site of contestation, in which a ra.
In: PRIO new security studies
In: Security dialogue, Band 55, Heft 3, S. 293-310
ISSN: 1460-3640
Who has responsibility for addressing the security implications of climate change? States and the United Nations justify their existence on the promise of providing security. Yet, although the national and international security implications of climate change are increasingly acknowledged, incorporation of climate change in national security planning or institutional arrangements is far from universal, while debates in the UN Security Council about its role in addressing climate change have been characterized by contestation. This article examines key debates about the responsibilities these institutions have for providing security in the face of the threats posed by climate change, examining the extent to which these institutions accept responsibility for providing security in these contexts. Drawing on Toni Erskine's notion of institutional moral agency, the article examines a 2017 inquiry into the national security implications of climate change in Australia, and the September 2021 UN Security Council debate on the international security implications of climate change. These two case studies explicitly focus on the question of institutional responsibility – of the Australian Government and the UN Security Council respectively – for addressing the threat of climate change. In both cases these institutions stop short of accepting responsibility for providing security in the face of climate change, with limited policy responses or institutionalization as the result. With the security implications of climate change increasingly apparent, and increasingly recognized by these (and other) actors, the failure to accept responsibility raises potentially significant questions about the legitimacy of these institutions themselves.
In: Perspectives on politics, Band 21, Heft 4, S. 1525-1526
ISSN: 1541-0986
In: International affairs, Band 99, Heft 4, S. 1635-1651
ISSN: 1468-2346
World Affairs Online
In: New perspectives: interdisciplinary journal of Central & East European politics and international relations, Band 31, Heft 1, S. 39-44
ISSN: 2336-8268
World Affairs Online
In: Environmental politics, Band 32, Heft 4, S. 565-585
ISSN: 1743-8934
In: The Australian journal of politics and history: AJPH, Band 67, Heft 3-4, S. 542-542
ISSN: 1467-8497
In: Journal of Posthumanism, Band 1, Heft 1
ISSN: 2634-3584
I don't feel as though this short commentary warrants one, but could provide one if required.
In: Ethics & international affairs, Band 34, Heft 2, S. 255-257
ISSN: 1747-7093
In: Australian journal of political science: journal of the Australasian Political Studies Association, Band 56, Heft 1, S. 1-18
ISSN: 1363-030X
In: Australian journal of international affairs: journal of the Australian Institute of International Affairs, Band 73, Heft 6, S. 519-524
ISSN: 1465-332X
In: International theory: a journal of international politics, law and philosophy, Band 10, Heft 2, S. 153-180
ISSN: 1752-9727
Climate change is increasingly characterized as a security issue. Yet we see nothing approaching consensus about the nature of the climate change–security relationship. Indeed existing depictions in policy statements and academic debate illustrate radically different conceptions of the nature of the threat posed, to whom and what constitute appropriate policy responses. These different climate security discourses encourage practices as varied as national adaptation and globally oriented mitigation action. Given the increasing prominence of climate security representations and the different implications of these discourses, it is important to consider whether we can identify progressive discourses of climate security: approaches to this relationship underpinned by defensible ethical assumptions and encouraging effective responses to climate change. Here I make a case for an ecological security discourse. Such a discourse orients towards ecosystem resilience and the rights and needs of the most vulnerable across space (populations of developing worlds), time (future generations), and species (other living beings). This paper points to the limits of existing accounts of climate security before outlining the contours of an 'ecological security discourse' regarding climate change. It concludes by reflecting on the challenges and opportunities for such discourse in genuinely informing how political communities approach the climate change–security relationship.
World Affairs Online