71 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
This title examines both the international ocean law disagreements that exist between the United States and Canada respecting maritime boundaries, fisheries and navigation rights and the numerous cooperative bilateral arrangements that have prevented these disputes from being significant causes of friction
In: Carolina Academic Press law casebook series
In: Ocean development & international law, Band 46, Heft 4, S. 359-367
ISSN: 1521-0642
In: German yearbook of international law: Jahrbuch für internationales Recht, Band 56, S. 33-62
ISSN: 0344-3094
World Affairs Online
In: Ocean development & international law, Band 44, Heft 2, S. 202-204
ISSN: 1521-0642
In: Beiträge zum ausländischen öffentlichen Recht und Völkerrecht; Arctic Science, International Law and Climate Change, S. 119-139
In: Ocean development & international law, Band 42, Heft 3, S. 280-287
ISSN: 1521-0642
In: Ocean development & international law, Band 41, Heft 2, S. 196-202
ISSN: 1521-0642
In: Ocean development & international law, Band 40, Heft 3, S. 304-307
ISSN: 1521-0642
In: Ocean development & international law, Band 40, Heft 1, S. 126-130
ISSN: 1521-0642
In: Ocean development & international law, Band 39, Heft 1, S. 115-117
ISSN: 1521-0642
In: Ocean development & international law, Band 37, Heft 3-4, S. 389-393
ISSN: 1521-0642
In: The Canadian yearbook of international law: Annuaire canadien de droit international, Band 43, S. 393-417
ISSN: 1925-0169
SummaryFor twenty years, both Canada and the United States were non-parties to the 1982 UN Convention on the Law of the Sea (LOS Convention). In 2003, Canada finally ratified the LOS Convention, leaving the United States as the only industrialized state that was not a party to the "constitution of the oceans." Canada's perspective on the US non-party status involves an equal measure of frustration/disappointment, appreciation/understanding, and ambivalence.
In: Ocean development & international law, Band 36, Heft 4, S. 381-386
ISSN: 1521-0642