Human research ethics committees and ethical review: The changing research culture for social workers
In: Australian social work: journal of the AASW, Band 58, Heft 4, S. 370-383
ISSN: 1447-0748
14 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: Australian social work: journal of the AASW, Band 58, Heft 4, S. 370-383
ISSN: 1447-0748
This text offers a comprehensive overview of the key aspects of globalisation, their impact on social work and the resulting challenges in practice. The authors draw on post-colonialism to consider the global issues facing social work, such as mass migration, and the ways in which social workers can respond to such difficulties.
In: Rethinking Social Work in a Global World, S. 154-164
In: Rethinking Social Work in a Global World, S. 86-103
In: Rethinking Social Work in a Global World, S. 104-120
In: Rethinking Social Work in a Global World, S. 121-138
In: Rethinking Social Work in a Global World, S. 12-32
In: Rethinking Social Work in a Global World, S. 51-67
In: Rethinking Social Work in a Global World, S. 68-85
In: Rethinking Social Work in a Global World, S. 33-50
In: Rethinking Social Work in a Global World, S. 139-153
In: Rethinking Social Work in a Global World, S. 1-11
In: Voluntary sector review: an international journal of third sector research, policy and practice, Band 1, Heft 1, S. 59-76
ISSN: 2040-8064
Governments around the world have sought to strengthen their relations with nonprofit organisations. In many jurisdictions this has led to the development of written framework agreements between government and the nonprofit sector, most commonly known as compacts. They have had widely differing impacts – some are seen as successful initiatives that have significantly strengthened relations between government and nonprofits, while others have had little effect and have been quickly discarded or ignored. This paper documents the recent evolution of such processes in the UK, Canada, Australia, the US, France, Estonia and Spain, and explores the parallels between them. The narratives from these countries illustrate an emerging common discourse, but also that the peculiarties of each polity have led to significantly different substantive outcomes.
In: Australian journal of social issues: AJSI, Band 43, Heft 4, S. 631-648
ISSN: 1839-4655
This paper examines the effect of funding contracts on the capacity of third‐sector organizations to effectively advocate. The relationship is not simple or obvious, with some organizations reporting 'mature relationships' with particular (state) departments, and others reporting difficulty with state or federal government jurisdictions. The paper spells out the negative effects of conflating service funding and advocacy. The paper concludes by exploring alternative institutional arrangements for the resourcing of advocacy including the establishment of a Public Interest Fund administered independently of any government department, one not requiring specific service contracts but rather evidence that it is advocating for the broader public good.