Suchergebnisse

The objective of the study was to determine the legal mechanisms for the use of innovative technologies in law enforcement and to outline the main problems of their implementation in the fight against crime. The methodological scheme of the article was the use of theoretical and empirical research methods, as well as comparative, structural and logical methods, documentary, and systems analysis. It is established that the main types of modern technologies used in law enforcement are unmanned aerial vehicles, artificial intelligence, robotics, biotechnology, analytical and geographic information systems, explosion locators and chatbots. The problems of introducing innovative technologies into law enforcement were found to be objective and subjective. The ways of overcoming them are offered through the creation of legal mechanisms for the legal use of various modern technologies by law enforcement agents. It is concluded that effective mechanisms for the use of innovations in law enforcement will increase the effectiveness of crime prevention and enable law enforcement officials to avoid conflicts related to violations of citizens' rights and the protection of national security.

The article addresses the basic concepts of administrative liability for environmental crimes based on international experience and practice through the investigative method of sociological analysis. Administrative sanctions that have a positive effect on the existing legislation of countries and those that have a positive effect only in certain regions were identified. It is argued that there are administrative and legal norms that do not have much influence and effectiveness in addressing environmental problems based on the structural and comparative research methods of the system. The issue of the consciousness of man and society in violation of environmental law is emphasized as a kind of administrative responsibility due to logical-semantic and formal-logical research methods. The key elements of the effectiveness of administrative responsibility in the field of environmental crimes are highlighted. It is concluded that the analysis of the implementation of environmental policy and its relationship with the practice of administrative responsibility for environmental crimes through the use of a dialectical research method ensures maximum efficiency in the identification of the topics of this study.