Discriminating between the directional and proximity spatial models of electoral competition
In: Electoral Studies, Band 14, Heft 3, S. 273-287
67 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: Electoral Studies, Band 14, Heft 3, S. 273-287
In: Electoral studies: an international journal, Band 14, Heft 3, S. 273-288
ISSN: 0261-3794
In: Public choice, Band 77, Heft 4, S. 739-756
ISSN: 1573-7101
In: Public choice, Band 77, Heft 4, S. 739-756
ISSN: 0048-5829
In: Public choice, Band 47, Heft 2, S. 389-403
ISSN: 1573-7101
In: Public choice, Band 47, Heft 2, S. 389
ISSN: 0048-5829
In: American journal of political science: AJPS, Band 28, Heft 1, S. 23
ISSN: 0092-5853
In: Public choice, Band 36, Heft 1, S. 115-134
ISSN: 1573-7101
In: Public choice, Band 33, Heft 2, S. 127-133
ISSN: 1573-7101
In: Public choice, Band 160, Heft 1-2, S. 7-24
ISSN: 1573-7101
In: Public choice, Band 155, Heft 1-2, S. 139-161
ISSN: 1573-7101
In: British journal of political science, Band 39, Heft 3, S. 539-558
ISSN: 1469-2112
A unidimensional spatial model of multiparty parliamentary elections under proportional representation is presented, in which parties project that the median parliamentary party will implement its policy position. The parties are assumed to be uncertain about the electoral impact of valence issues relating to party elites' images of competence, integrity and charisma. The assumptions of the model, highlighting the importance of the median party in parliament, are consistent with empirical work by McDonald and Budge. Under them, the existence of a Nash equilibrium under quite general concavity conditions is proved and it is shown that parties will moderate their positions when their valence images deteriorate. Computations of party equilibria are reported. The model and its implications for policy-seeking parties with results on vote-seeking parties can be contrasted with that recently reported by Schofield and Sened.
In: British journal of political science, Band 39, Heft 3, S. 539-558
ISSN: 0007-1234
In: American journal of political science, Band 52, Heft 2, S. 344-359
ISSN: 1540-5907
In the United States and Latin America, candidates for national and state‐level office frequently must win primary elections in order to advance to the general election. We model policy and valence issues for office‐seeking candidates facing such two‐stage elections. We determine a Nash equilibrium for the candidates' optimal strategies, and we find that holding a primary is likely to increase a party's chances of winning the general election, particularly in situations where valence issues that involve the candidates' campaigning skills and that are not known prior to the campaign are more salient than policy issues. Furthermore, we find that primary elections are especially likely to benefit parties that expect to be underdogs in the general election. Our conclusions are directly relevant to U.S. politics and by extension to the strategic decisions that many Latin American parties currently confront, about whether it is strategically desirable to hold primaries.
In: Public choice, Band 131, Heft 3-4, S. 413-434
ISSN: 1573-7101