Suchergebnisse

We think of transnationalism as a tendency to delegate local, national and regional problems to transnational bodies and extol their virtues as unquestionably unbiased, rational, expert informed, consensual, creating a system informed by Habermasian communication. In the present state of world affairs, problems ranging from political, climatic, environmental and economic issues, to those concerning human rights infringements and biological and social diversity, are often seen as solvable through expert handling and mediated negotiations. The virtues of old-fashioned internationalism (of the Communist International, for instance) are dissolved in particularism and corporate style (because we need to understand the true nature of transnational institutions as corporations) identity politics. Growing grassroots alt-right and mass populist low right movements attest to a disoriented rage towards the faceless acronyms (like IMF) deciding on millions of individual destinies. The hope of internationalism as the bright future of humanity is highjacked to a collection of phrases at worst and humiliating humanitarian aid at best.

EU cultural policy is supposed to emphasize European values and to promote integration with sustaining diversity. Since European policies have repercussions on understanding of social needs in order to emulate Europe in the periphery, that is, candidate countries, which include ex-Yu states that are not EU members, the perception of European culture (encompassing values and politics) in the countries at the periphery influences political rhetoric and political outcomes. Lack of any integrative features in EU cultural policies allows for nationalist rhetoric to be merged with pro-EU rhetoric and to perpetuate nationalist tensions in the region.