Data Governance Act: On International Transfers of Non-Personal Data and GDPR Mimesis
In: (2023) 9(1) European Data Protection Law Review 13 – 26.
11 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: (2023) 9(1) European Data Protection Law Review 13 – 26.
SSRN
In: Belarus-Analysen, Heft 63, S. 6-8
ISSN: 2192-1350
In Brüssel werden neue Sanktionen gegen Minsk und Moskau diskutiert. Die neuen restriktiven Maßnahmen gegen Minsk sollen nicht nur eine Antwort auf die Aufstellung eines gemeinsamen Truppenverbandes von Belarus und Russland darstellen, sondern auch verhindern, dass Russland die Sanktionen mit Hilfe von
Belarus umgeht. Allerdings birgt die zunehmende Harmonisierung der EU-Sanktionen gegen Belarus und Russland das Risiko, dass Belarus nicht als ein eigenständiges Thema der EU-Politik behandelt wird, sondern als integraler Bestandteil der EU-Agenda zu Russland. Um dies zu vermeiden, muss die EU in Bezug auf Belarus einen präziseren, strategischen und länderspezifischen Ansatz verfolgen.
Forschungsstelle Osteuropa
In: Belarus-Analysen, Band 63, S. 6-8
ISSN: 2192-1350
World Affairs Online
In: European foreign affairs review, Band 27, Heft 2, S. 181-202
ISSN: 1875-8223
World Affairs Online
In: GMF Policy Paper 2022
SSRN
In: European Foreign Affairs Review, Band 27, Heft 2 : 181–202
SSRN
In: Competition in World Politics - Knowledge, Strategies and Institutions. Editors: Russ, Daniela, Stafford, James. 261-286. transcript Verlag 27 Jun 2021 Available at: https://www.transcript-verlag.de/978-3-8376-5747-0/competition-in-world-politics/?number=978-3-8376-5747-0&fbclid=IwAR2KsIqnlDB1P3mN2e
SSRN
Working paper
In: Security and Law, EDITOR(S):Anton Vedder, Jessica Schroers, Charlotte Ducuing, Peggy Valcke, KU Leuven Centre for IT & IP Law Series, VOLUME:7 (2019)
SSRN
Working paper
In: 6(1): 3. Europe and the World: A Law Review, 2022
SSRN
In: 7(1) European Papers 2022
SSRN
In: Miadzvetskaya , Y & Wessel , R A 2022 , ' The Externalisation of the EU's Cybersecurity Regime : The Cyber Diplomacy Toolbox ' , European Papers , vol. 7 , no. 1 , pp. 413-438 . https://doi.org/10.15166/2499-8249/570 ; ISSN:2499-8249
It is often claimed that there is a blurring line between external and internal security in the EU with both being increasingly intertwined. Apart from providing the state of affairs in EU cybersecurity law and policy, the argument of this contribution is that these internal-external links are also visible in a growing tendency towards the externalisation of the EU's cybersecurity policy. Typical interior policy fields in that area that were tackled through the internal market and the Area of Freedom Security and Justice (AFSJ) legal bases, are now penetrating the field of action of the Common Foreign and Security Policy (CFSP). This tendency towards a growing externalisation of the EU cybersecurity will be demonstrated by analysing the emblematic EU's Cyber Diplomacy Toolbox and its deterrence instrument: restrictive measures in response to cyber-attacks. Our analysis pinpoints a number of limitations for the EU's common action under the CFSP, including problems of attribution and evidence collection. Our Article questions whether the CFSP is fit for the digital age and what repercussions cyber threats may have for the future of the EU CFSP and its Cyber Diplomacy Toolbox.
BASE