Suchergebnisse

Using normative legal research is legal research that places law as a norm system building. The norm system built is regarding the principles, norms, rules of legislation, court decisions, agreements, and doctrine (teachings). In understanding the 2020 Government Regulation, it shouldn't include things that the state cannot actually enter into. But the state must focus on more rational things, such as cutting trees, how to carry out marriages that are not according to procedures, such as flying lanterns excessively in residential areas. In understanding this 2020 Government Regulation, complex thinking is needed so that private rights don't mix with public rights, which if the state enters, it will create legal conflicts with the community.

Understanding formation of laws and regulations is not just applying what is contained in law but wanting to know what democracy means properly. Understanding of democracy because people in Indonesia tend to glorify democracy as a good thing. Then when the artificial goodness of democracy exists, it is possible to be unfair to oneself. That possibility tends to lead a person's incompetence when society's wishes are not met or conflict with his own. Of course, democracy doesn't always mean same when applied. Different definitions of each regime is a circle that must be passed by a country.

This study uses normative legal research that uses legislation and current conditions to carry out legal interpretation. In this case, the phrase "self-request" is defined as a request that originates from his own awareness that his actions have harmed the community. This means that there is no conflict preceded by the act of resigning oneself. Self-awareness of actions is important to understand the meaning of "self-demand". The Governor of East Java is better off resigning at his own request because this action will make the state focus on legal certainty.

When referring to the Decree of the President of the Republic of Indonesia Number 1/PNPS of 1965 concerning Prevention of Abuse and/or Blasphemy of Religion , religion is calculated based on quantity. Explanation of article 1 that religious adopted by the population in Indonesia are Islam, Christianity, Catholicism, Hinduism, Buddhism, Confucianism. This can be proven in the history of the development of Religious in Indonesia. Because these 6 kinds of religions are religions which are practiced by almost the entire population of Indonesia. Based on the discussion, the results obtained, namely the inclusion of religious teachings in the formation of laws and regulations, are matters that must be separated. Separation of religion in the formation of laws and regulations must be done so that the legal justice achieved can go well.

Penelitian ini bertujuan mengetahui bentuk pemerintahan demokrasi secara tepat ketika omnibus law diterapkan. Metode penelitian yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini menggunakan metode analitis hukum. Temuan penelitian adalah bentuk pemerintahan perspektif omnibus law merupakan demokrasi gabungan Plato dan Polybius karena tujuan akhir adalah kesejahteraan masyarakat yang dikombinasikan dengan kekausaan negara secara secara utuh. Kekuasaan negara secara utuh bukan semena-mena melainkan tetap dibatasi kehdenak dari masyarakat itu sendiri. Adanya bentuk gabungan bentuk pemerintahan demokrasi akan meniadakan makna demokrasi ekonomi seperti dalam Pasal 33 Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945. Demokrasi ekonomi tersebut bukanlah bentuk pemerintahan melainkan sebutan untuk mendefinisikan makna negara dari Pasal 33 Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945. Dampak dari temuan ini akan membatasi omnibus law yang pada awalnya bagian dari kekuasaan negara secara mutlak. Adanya penggabungan bentuk demokrasi gabungan Plato dan Polybius merupakan penegasan akan demokrasi yang dianut oleh Indonesia. Penggabungan harus segera dijadikan dasar dalam segala hal karena adanya omnibus law juga bertentangan dengan demokrasi menurut Plato yang awalnya mensejahterahkan rakyat dengan menerima masukan dari segala masyarakat untuk langgengnya negara. Tetapi negara juga tidak dapat mengetahui kapan omnibus law harus dilakukan negara, karena sifatnya yang tiba-tiba maka pelegalan bentuk pemerintahan Plato dan Polybius segera dilakukan. Penerapan omnibus law tetap harus melalui pengawasan Dewan Perwakilan Rakyat agar tercipta check and balances serta partisipasi masyarakat sesuai Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 15 Tahun 2019 tentang Perubahan Atas Undang-Undang Nomor 12 Tahun 2011 Tentang Pembentukan Peraturan Perundang-Undangan.

In a country, the form of government is an important part because it is one of the conditions to be called a country. The form of Indonesian government refers to Article 1 paragraph (1) of the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia (1945 Constitution) is a republic. But when reading Article 33 of the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia, Indonesia embraces economic democracy. On that basis, the formulation of the problem that the author raised what form of democracy is desired in the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia? The conclusion obtained is that it cannot be defined that the desired democracy is early democracy because of the mixing of many parties. The desired democracy is a democracy mixed with a form of tyrannical government.

AbstractThe purpose of this study is to offer novelty regarding the emergency status issued by the Indonesian government appropriately. Using normative research with an orientation that is not based on conceptual. The initial beginnings that occurred in Indonesia resulted in changes in the application of the law, especially state administration law where an emergency had two components, namely the legal framework consisting of the constitution and the legislative basis for emergencies and the operational framework involving organizational structures and strategic plans for dealing with emergencies. In this case the government must immediately lockdown because in the principle of emergency state administration law is an absolute thing that must be done. To carry out lockdown, it requires firmness and a combined security of all parties. Lockdown must also be limited by legal norms such as a presidential decree to avoid arbitrariness by the government. Such understanding is important so that the country can run well.Keywords: corona; emergency statutory law; lossAbstrakTujuan penelitian menawarkan kebaruan terkait status kedaruratan yang dikeluarkan oleh pemerintah Indonesia secara tepat. Menggunakan penelitian normatif dengan orientasi yang tidak bersumber pada konseptual. Permulaaan awal yang terjadi di Indonesia mengakibatkan perubahan dalam penerapan hukum khususnya hukum tata negara dimana adanya keadaan darurat memiliki dua komponen yaitu kerangka hukum yang terdiri dari undang-undang dasar dan basis legislatif untuk keadaan darurat serta kerangka kerja operasional yang melibatkan organisasi struktur dan rencana strategis untuk berurusan dengan keadaan darurat. Di dalam hal ini pemerintah harus segera melakukan lockdown karena dalam prinsip hukum tata negara darurat adalah hal mutlak yang harus dilakukan. Untuk melakasanakan lockdown maka dibutuhkan ketegasan dan gabungan keamanan dari segala piha. Lockdown juga wajib dibatasi dengan norma hukum seperti keputusan presiden agar tidak timbul kesewenang-wenangan dari pemerintah. Pemahaman demikian penting agar negara dapat berjalan dengan baik.Kata kunci: corona; hukum tata negara darurat; kerugian

A person in legal studies can be referred to as a legal subject because he commits the rights and obligations relating to certain matters. As in the early part of Surabaya mayor's draft regulation about the procedures of choosing the Board of Community Empowerment Institution of Local Village Village Institution, Citizen Association and the Neighborhood Association (draft regulation of surabaya's mayor) that in order to regulate the relationship between Surabaya government with Community Empowerment Institution (LPMK), Citizen Association (RW and the Neighborhood Association (RT) as partners in the implementation of development in the city of Surabaya, the government of Surabaya has established the Mayor's regulation No. 38 year 2016 on implementation of the Surabaya City Regulation number 15 year 2003 about the guidelines for forming the organization of resilience community of Kelurahan Institutions, RW and RT who are about to organize the electoral ordinances Management of LPMK, RW and RT. The draft of Surabaya's Mayor regulation before it was confirmed was conducted socialization by the law of the secretariat of Surabaya area in Surabaya on 19 March 2019. This activity has been in accordance with Act No. 12-2011 where the socialization of the first to know the aspirations of the public in this case stakeholders related to the draft Perwali Surabaya. Article 21 of Act No. 25-2009 shows the purpose of a legal state relating to the so-called task of managing and organizing tasks. Related to the government in the modern state, Spelt and ten Berge, distinguishes them in the tasks of regulating and managing the tasks (ordenende en verzorgende taken).

A law is said to be good if the law goes according to its function. By all means is to implement the law in law science. The application of the law is a state characteristic of the law in which the application will be achieved legal objectives consisting of legal justice, legal certainty and legal benefit. Starting from this, the development of tourism in Indonesia, especially in the Dutch cemetry in Peneleh Surabaya does not comply with Act No. 10-2009. This development is also influenced by human resources in this case the government of Surabaya is less concerned about the existence of the Dutch cemetry in Peneleh Surabaya. By doing empirism Research, the results are still low desire of Surabaya city government because the location is not located in the city center

Indonesia's position in electoral development is getting better because of the legislation. It is different when a strong bargaining position is artificial. In this case, the state becomes strong because of its own efforts such as having sophisticated technology programs, producing sophisticated weapons, or having world-class athletes. The problem is when the candidate listed in the empty ballot has been elected by the community but the chosen one does not win, then such election is actually not of the will of the community. This study uses normative legal study design which means that it is normative juridical legal research. The approaches used in legal research are statute approach, case approach, and conceptual approach. Future elections will no longer change when there is no legal clarity in Indonesia if the robot is included in it. The election aimed at robots for is not being a contradiction but is a way out to produce elections that are truly fair. When we choose robots in the elections, artificial intelligence holds norms in society. Artificial intelligence will become a habit in Indonesia, turning to jus cogens because its main nature is indirect force.

he Faculty of Law currently does not stand in humanities or social affairs. Faculty of law is sui generis law. As a result of its specialty, the Faculty of Law actually does not have a study program and the legal division should not exist, but in the development of science specificity is needed in a science. Such legal issues make it difficult for the Law Faculty to conduct Tri Dharma in accordance with the Guide to Research and Community Service Edition XII 2018, which is published by the Directorate of Research and Community Service, Directorate General of Research and Development Strengthening Ministry of Research, Technology and Higher Education. By using normative research that is by examining library material with a legislative and conceptual approach. It was found that the Law Faculty had to break away from the exclusive nature that emphasized normative or empirical legal research. Orthodox research cannot be a counterweight to modern legal research. Legal research must 275 explore the mixed methods and prioritize interpretations so that the highest legal objectives are achieved, namely legal justice. Keywords: Faculty of Law, Modernity, Orthodox, Normative.

Right is the basic essentials that can make legislation run well. But every practice of right always causes some legal issues. It means that the practice of every human in Indonesia can have right to have rights is not used yet, because of the exist of Pancasila. Indonesia needs to care more about this, that every citizen must have their right to have rights, as long as the right is not divide the unity and integrity of the nation of Indonesia. What's mean with the right that Indonesian people must get is about right to live or death, right to choose their own religion, or right to choose their sex

Keharusan mencantumkan frasa "DENGAN RAHMAT TUHAN YANG MAHA ESA" di setiap jenjang peraturan perundang-undangan bertentangan dengan tujuan hukum yaitu keadilan hukum, kemanfaatan hukum dan kepastian hukum. Permasalahan yang muncul apakah hakikat makna frasa "DENGAN RAHMAT TUHAN YANG MAHA ESA" dalam Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 12 Tahun 2011 tentang Pembentukan Peraturan Perundang-Undangan. Kesimpulan yang diperoleh yaitu frasa "DENGAN RAHMAT TUHAN YANG MAHA ESA" merupakan suatu legalisasi peraturan perundang-undangan untuk tetap dilaksanakan tanpa melihat realita dalam masyarakat dan diolah menjadi fakta hukum sesuai keilmuan hukum. Frasa "DENGAN RAHMAT TUHAN YANG MAHA ESA" dapat dijadikan legitimasi kelompok tertentu dalam memaksakan kehendak kepada kelompok lainnya. Saran yaitu menghapus frasa "DENGAN RAHMAT TUHAN YANG MAHA ESA" pada setiap peraturan perundang-undangan karena kata "Tuhan" hanya sebagai simbol yang tidak membawa pengaruh apapun dalam melaksanakan peraturan perundang-undangan tersebut. Penghapusan frasa "DENGAN RAHMAT TUHAN YANG MAHA ESA" akan menunjukkan Indonesia sebagai bangsa yang benar-benar mengutamakan keadilan tanpa terkecuali. Penghapusan frasa "DENGAN RAHMAT TUHAN YANG MAHA ESA" di setiap peraturan perundang-undangan sebagai wujud menciptakan perdamaian tanpa adanya unsur paksaan agama dan politik terhadap masing-masing individu. Kata kunci: Tuhan, dengan rahmat Tuhan Yang Maha Esa, keadilan.

AbstrakKomunisme di Indonesia memiliki stigma buruk akibat bercampurnya dengan unsur politik.Hal ini secara khusus tampak dalam proses pemilihan ketua partai di Indonesia, di manapada setiap Anggaran Dasar/Anggaran Rumah Tangga kepartaian secara tidak langsungmenyiratkan komunisme sebagai ideologi terlarang. Oleh karenanya, muncul paradigmadalam masyarakat bahwa komunisme adalah ideologi yang sesat. Tulisan ini menunjukanbahwa Komunisme tidak memiliki korelasi dalam proses pemilihan ketua partai politik.Proses pemilihan ketua partai politik tidak akan berjalan secara demokrasi apabila dalamAnggaran Dasar/Anggaran Rumah Tangga suatu partai politik tidak mendapatkan legalisasidari Pemerintah.AbstractCommunism has unfortunately had a bad reputation in Indonesia as a result of the tendencyto blend this ideology with political elements. This is particularly apparent in theprocess of selecting a party chairperson in Indonesia, in which the Statute/Articles of Association of any party indirectly implied that communism is a forbidden ideology. Therefore, the notion that communism is anunacceptable ideology could easily emerge among the members of society. This paper shows that Communism has in fact no significant correlation in the process of selecting the chairperson of a political party. The process of selecting the chair person of a political party will not run in a democratic way if the Statute/Articles of Association of a political party did not obtain previous legalization ofthe Government.

The increasing corruption in Indonesia occurs because of the indecision of the leader. This is contrary to the 1945 Constitution of the republic of Indonesia that the position of the president is the chief executive. This has repercussions on the position where the president to act without pressure in combating corruption. The leader can apply the Niccolo Machiavelli's idea that is to take the ideas of the people and focus on those ideas, and then restore those ideas to the people so that they apply them, and to make corrections in case of errors. Such is the basic method of leadership. In conclusion, Niccolo Machiavelli's ideais appropriate to be applied in combating corruption because in the Law Bo. 20 of 2001 has created a justice for the perpetrators of corruption when declared as the accused of corruption. The main concern is to take advantage with the position of president as the chief executive, in which the president may also be subject to the decisive law. This firm attitude will have an impact on law enforcement to implement legislation fairly. The suggestions that can be put forward in combating corruption is understanding the doctrine of jurisprudence, from countries, that are considered poor should be a critical review in the development of legal science in Indonesia, extending the meaning of gratification by incorporating sexual elements, and applying social sanctions.