Suchergebnisse

Abstract The world in the new decade comes with heavy baggage from the previous periods. It is important to emphasize that these events opened a number of important new safety trends worldwide which will be facing us in the future: the emergence of new urban violence, rising food prices and an increase in hunger worldwide, an increase in migration processes from areas of endangerment and low resources towards those rich in resources, an increase in intolerance and ethnic violence in developed societies, the development of various movements and activities which create new security challenges for modern states, but also the human community as a whole, more frequent natural disasters, threats to critical infrastructure, and similar occurrences. It seems that in the future we will be facing the challenges that have arisen in the past, but for which we have not found a solution to reduce or eliminate them, and new challenges that could significantly jeopardize the many forms of modern life. One of the negative consequences of such a development could be our feeling that the challenges are becoming more complex and our political institutions do not have enough power to deal with them, which could initiate a search for new answers that do not necessarily have to mean progress but rather the opposite. If we add intense terrorist attacks and threats out of control even in traditionally resilient societies to all of the above, then the times in which we live show an ever greater need for the involvement of the private security sector in the protection of critical infrastructure, people, assets and operations at all levels of the societal organization. The solution lies in the good communication and cooperation between the public and private security sector, where the private security serves only a preventive role.

U suvremenim uvjetima globalni terorizam je izborio visoko mjesto na listi prioriteta nacionalne sigurnosti. Geopolitika terorizma globalna je i ako se neka zemlja ne želi baviti terorizmom, terorizam će se sigurno baviti njom – izravno ili neizravno. Globalizacija je stvorila gotovo idealne uvjete za lakši protok ljudi, roba, financijskih sredstava i što je posebno važno, maksimalno je povećan protok informacija. To je olakšalo razvoj i operacije terorističkih organizacija. No, ipak su danas države i međunarodne organizacije postale svjesne opasnosti kojima je suvremeno društvo izloženo djelovanjem organiziranih terorističkih skupina. Međunarodna zajednica, i posebno SAD i EU, pa i Republika Hrvatska, razvile su opsežan i prije svega kompliciran sustav za borbu protiv terorizma. Postoje brojni dokumenti koji čine pravnu, političku i akcijsku osnovu za učinkovitu borbu protiv terorizma.Predmet ovog rada je kratki komparativni prikaz načina na koji SAD, Europskaunija i Republika Hrvatska tretiraju terorizam u svojim strategijskim dokumentima: National strategy for combating terorism – SAD, European security strategy – EU, i Nacionalna strategija za prevenciju i suzbijanje terorizma – Republika Hrvatska. Namjera je autora, analizirati, utvrditi i pokazati načine na koji su u strategijskim dokumentima definirani i poimani teroristička prijetnja, njen sadržaj i značenje, kao i uzroci i posljedice na vlastitu i globalnu sigurnost. Cilj rada je otkriti, analizira i utvrdi da li se i u čemu navedene strategije razlikuju. Kvalitativnom analizom sadržaja navedenih strategijskih dokumenata kao i njihovom komparativnom analizom, autori će ukazati na sigurnosne posljedice različitih strateških odgovora na terorizam. --- In contemporary conditions global terrorism has won a high ranking on the list of the priorities of national security. The geo-politics of terrorism is global and even if a country does not wish to deal with terrorism, terrorism will certainly wish to deal with it – directly or indirectly. Globalisation has created almost ideal conditions for easier flow of people, goods, financial means and, particularly important, maximally increased flow of information. This has facilitated the development and operations of terrorist organizations. However, the governments and international organizations have become aware of the dangers to which modern society has been exposed by the activities of the organized terrorist groups. The international community, and especially USA and EU, as well as the Republic of Croatia have developed an extensive and above all complicated system to combat terrorism. There are numerous documents that constitute legal, political, and action basis for efficient fighting against terrorism. The subject of this paper is a short comparative presentation of the methods inwhich the USA, European Union and the Republic of Croatia have been treating terrorism in their strategic documents: National Strategy for Combating terrorism – USA, European Security Strategy – EU, and National Strategy for Prevention and Combating Terrorism – the Republic of Croatia. The intention is to analyze, determine, and present methods in which strategic documents define and treat the terrorist threat, its contents, and meaning, as well as the causes and consequences for one's own and global security. The aim of the paper is to discover, analyze, and determine whether the mentioned strategies differ and in what. Qualitative analysis of the contents of the mentioned strategic documents as well as with their comparative analysis, the authors will indicate the security consequences of different strategic responses to terrorism.

Kako bi bio efikasniji, sigurnosni sustav mora se bazirati na suradnji partnera na lokalnoj, regionalnoj, međunarodnoj i globalnoj razini. Koordinativni pristup multidisciplinarnom sigurnosnom sustavu podrazumijeva zajedničku namjeru, misiju, viziju i ciljeve svih institucija i tijela kojima je dodijeljena uloga u pružanju i očuvanju sigurnosti države i njenog stanovništva. Međuresorna suradnja sigurnosnog sektora predstavlja odnos između dijela ili dijelova različitih sektora društva koji su formirani u svrhu provedbi mjera i aktivnosti vezanih za pitanja sigurnosti. U poslovima sigurnosti veoma je važna međusobna suradnja svih sektora društva. Svrha ovakvog sveobuhvatnog pristupa upravo je osiguranje stabilnosti i sigurnosti. Svaki oblik suradnje podrazumijeva postizanje više razine operativnosti nego što bi se to moglo postići samostalnim djelovanjem. U ovom radu autori će se baviti pitanjima međuresorne suradnje policije, vojske i sigurnosno-obavještajnih agencija. Suvremene asimetrične ugroze ne poznaju nacionalne granice i ne sputavaju ih limitacije u nadležnostima pojedinih resora, poput vojske i policije te je u cilju efikasnog kriznog planiranja, na nacionalnoj razini, potrebno intenzivirati multidisciplinarnu koordinaciju sudionika sigurnosnog sektora. Sukladno navedenom, sigurnosni sustav mora biti u stanju operativnosti kako bi izvršio sve operacije pod jedinstvenom strukturom nadležnosti i kontrole institucija. --- To be effective, security system must be based on co-operation of partners at local, regional, international and global level. Co-ordinated approach to a multidisciplinary security system implies a common purpose, mission, vision and goals of all the institutions and bodies that have been assigned the roles in providing and preserving the security of the state and its population. Intersectoral cooperation of the security sector represents a relationship between part or parts of different sectors of society that are formed for the purpose of implementing the measures and activities related to safety issues. When it comes to the field of security activities the co-operation of all sectors of society is of great importance. The purpose of such comprehensive approach is precisely to ensure stability and security. Any form of cooperation includes the achievement of higher levels of operability than it could be achieved through independent operations. The authors will address issues of intersectoral cooperation of police, military and security intelligence agencies. Modern asymmetrical threats know no national boundaries and are not bound by limitations in the jurisdiction of certain departments, such as the army and police and in the purpose of efficient crisis planning, at the national level, it is necessary to intensify the coordination of multi-disciplinary participants of the security sector. Accordingly, the security system must be in state of operability in order to perform all operations under a single structure of institutional jurisdiction and control.