Suchergebnisse

в монографии анализируются положения действующего законодательства в сфере информационной безопасности. Обосновывается актуальность проблемы обеспечения информационной безопасности в современной России. Анализируются концептуальные теоретические подходы к определению понятия информационной безопасности ; а также положения действующего законодательства в сфере информационной безопасности. Уделяется внимание анализу факторов обеспечения информационной безопасности в Российской Федерации. ; the monograph analyzes the provisions of the current legislation in the field of information security. The urgency of the problem of ensuring information security in modern Russia is substantiated. Conceptual theoretical approaches to the definition of the concept of information security ; as well as provisions of the current legislation in the field of information security are analyzed. Attention is paid to the analysis of factors ensuring information security in the Russian Federation.

Letter from Mr. Felipe Pavlovich to Gen. Alvaro Obregón on the possible participation of the Yaqui River farmers in the Chickpea Growers Union. Mr. Felipe Pavlovich's letter to Gen. Alvaro Obregón informing that he sent him two boxes of oranges. Response and New Year's greetings. / Carta del Sr. Felipe Pavlovich al Gral. Alvaro Obregón sobre la posible participación de los agricultores del Río Yaqui en el Sindicato de Garbanceros. Carta del Sr. Felipe Pavlovich al Gral. Alvaro Obregón informándole que le envió dos cajas de naranja. Respuesta y felicitación por el Año Nuevo.

None of the many riddles in the reign of Tsar Alexander I is so intriguing as that of the position of the heir apparent, the Grand Duke Constantine Pavlovich. His secret renunciation of his right to the throne cast doubt on Nicholas I's succession and contributed to the opportunity of the Decembrist conspirators. Moreover, as commander of the armed forces in Poland he was the chief figure in its government. The uprising of November 1830 signified the failure of Alexander's Polish plans, but it was also a personal tragedy for Constantine, who had so thoroughly identified himself with the new kingdom. His role in history was important; by his own choice it had not become much greater, but neither his contemporaries nor historians have agreed as to his qualifications to rule an empire.Accounts differ even as to his capacity to manage the Polish army, or indeed to govern himself. A British historian in the nineteenth century described him as "a savage prince whose conduct and character made him more like a brute than a man." This opinion was an extreme version of a common view of Constantine in the last century; the attitude is reflected by some writers of our own age, although few have gone so far as one modern author who pictured the Tsesarevich as "that insane hyena." Polish writers, to further their justification of the 1830 revolt, assigned much of the discontent in that country to Constantine's "despotic" conduct, but even Russian and other historians have agreed that his explosive temperament and dislike for the Polish Constitution contributed to the uprising.

He was born on August 5, 1844 in the small Ukrainian town of Chuguev. Son of a settler farmer and ex-military, and like many sons of military colonists, went to the academy of topography of the military school, where he arose his passion for drawing, painting and sculpture. At the age of thirteen he demonstrated his ability to make portraits and devoted himself to making religious icons and restorations for the Orthodox churches of his people, under the teaching of iconographer Bunakov. ; Nació el 5 de agosto de 1844 en la pequeña ciudad ucraniana de Chuguev. Hijo de un colono agricultor y exmilitar, y al igual que muchos hijos de colonos militares, fue a la academia de topografía de la escuela militar, donde surgió su pasión por el dibujo, la pintura y la escultura. A los trece años demostró su facultad para hacer retratos y se dedicó a realizar íconos religiosos y restauraciones para las iglesias ortodoxas de su pueblo, bajo la enseñanza del iconografista Bunakov.

Memories of Novosibirsk economist Boris Pavlovich Orlov consist of three episodes. The first analyzes his work "Development of Transport in the USSR". The author analyzes the fundamental nature of the work, the use of archival data and the truthfulness of the analysis. An objective coverage of the history of Soviet transport is noted, especially during the periods of the first five-year plan and the Soviet-Finnish war. The author gives a qualified analysis of the reasons for the orientation in railway transport towards the development of track facilities and the expansion and renewal of rolling stock instead of new railway construction. The second episode is connected with the defense of Ph.D. thesis of the author, in which Boris Pavlovich was the first opponent. Despite the seditiousness of many of its provisions for that time, Orlov supported it and highly appreciated it. The third episode is connected with the author's leadership of the student scientific society at the Faculty of Economics of the Novosibirsk State University, of which Orlov was then the dean. The scientific work of this society, which boldly explored the acute problems of the socialist economy, was subjected to political persecution. Boris Pavlovich did not take any part in this company, at the risk of his administrative position. In conclusion, the high level of Boris Pavlovich Orlov's qualifications, his honesty, civic courage and decency are discussed in the article.

.

.