Kant's Grounded Cosmopolitanism: Original Common Possession and the Right to Visit. By Jakob Huber. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2022. 208p. $90.00 cloth
In: Perspectives on politics, p. 1-2
ISSN: 1541-0986
12 results
Sort by:
In: Perspectives on politics, p. 1-2
ISSN: 1541-0986
In: Contemporary political theory: CPT
ISSN: 1476-9336
In: Political theory: an international journal of political philosophy, Volume 49, Issue 4, p. 554-583
ISSN: 1552-7476
This essay explores the problem of legitimation crises in deliberative systems. For some time now, theorists of deliberative democracy have started to embrace a "systemic approach." But if deliberative democracy is to be understood in the context of a system of multiple moving parts, then we must confront the possibility that that system's dynamics may admit of breakdowns, contradictions, and tendencies toward crisis. Yet such crisis potentials remain largely unexplored in deliberative theory. The present article works toward rectifying this lacuna, using the 2016 Brexit and Trump votes as examples of a particular kind of "legitimation crisis" that results in a sequence of failures in the deliberative system. Drawing on recent work of Rainer Forst, I identify this particular kind of legitimation crisis as a "justification crisis."
In: Contemporary political theory: CPT, Volume 20, Issue 4, p. 836-857
ISSN: 1476-9336
AbstractAfter a recent spate of terrorist attacks in European and American cities, liberal democracies are reintroducing emergency securitarian measures (ESMs) that curtail rights and/or expand police powers. Political theorists who study ESMs are familiar with how such measures become instruments of discrimination and abuse, but the fundamental conflict ESMs pose for not just civil liberty but also democratic equality still remains insufficiently explored. Such phenomena are usually explained as a function of public panic or fear-mongering in times of crisis, but I show that the tension between security and equality is in fact much deeper and more general. It follows a different logic than the more familiar tension between security and liberty, and it concerns not just the rule of law in protecting liberty but also the role of law in integrating new or previously subjected groups into a democratic community. As liberal-democratic societies become increasingly diverse and multicultural in the present era of mass immigration and global interconnectedness, this tension between security and equality is likely to become more pronounced.
This essay explores the problem of legitimation crises in deliberative systems. For some time now, theorists of deliberative democracy have started to embrace a "systemic approach." But if deliberative democracy is to be understood in the context of a system of multiple moving parts, then we must confront the possibility that that system's dynamics may admit of breakdowns, contradictions, and tendencies toward crisis. Yet such crisis potentials remain largely unexplored in deliberative theory. The present article works toward rectifying this lacuna, using the 2016 Brexit and Trump votes as examples of a particular kind of "legitimation crisis" that results in a sequence of failures in the deliberative system. Drawing on recent work of Rainer Forst, I identify this particular kind of legitimation crisis as a "justification crisis."
BASE
In: Zeitschrift für politische Theorie, Volume 8, Issue 2, p. 281-290
ISSN: 2196-2103
In: Zeitschrift für politische Theorie, Volume 8, Issue 2, p. 281-290
ISSN: 2196-2103
In: European journal of political theory: EJPT, Volume 14, Issue 2, p. 141-160
ISSN: 1474-8851
In: European journal of political theory: EJPT, Volume 14, Issue 2, p. 141-160
ISSN: 1741-2730
"Crisis" is a key concept in our political lexicon. Since the beginning of the modern age, it has arguably been, as much as anything, the experience of crisis that has calibrated the aims of both politics and political theory. But as central as crisis experiences have been for the shaping of our political imaginary, the concept itself has proven difficult to incorporate into the political theory enterprise. In this article, I argue that we can think politically about crisis by taking up a "pragmatist" perspective that focuses on how we deploy crisis as a conceptual tool for guiding judgments and coordinating actions. I argue that crisis is a fundamentally reflexive concept that bridges our traditional distinctions between objective phenomena and normative experience, and whose very usage implies the active participation of those involved in it. Only by examining these crucial aspects of the crisis concept can we begin to grasp its normative political content, as well as how it may be deployed in the service of political action and social change.
In: Reinventing Critical Theory
In: suhrkamp taschenbuch wissenschaft 2307