Methodology for neutronic uncertainty propagation and application to a UAM-LWR benchmark
In: Progress in nuclear energy: the international review journal covering all aspects of nuclear energy, Band 126, S. 103389
ISSN: 0149-1970
10 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: Progress in nuclear energy: the international review journal covering all aspects of nuclear energy, Band 126, S. 103389
ISSN: 0149-1970
In: Progress in nuclear energy: the international review journal covering all aspects of nuclear energy, Band 110, S. 393-409
ISSN: 0149-1970
In: Progress in nuclear energy: the international review journal covering all aspects of nuclear energy, Band 36, Heft 4, S. 469
ISSN: 0149-1970
In: Progress in nuclear energy: the international review journal covering all aspects of nuclear energy, Band 36, Heft 2, S. 189-229
ISSN: 0149-1970
In: Progress in nuclear energy: the international review journal covering all aspects of nuclear energy, Band 134, S. 103680
ISSN: 0149-1970
In: Progress in nuclear energy: the international review journal covering all aspects of nuclear energy, Band 115, S. 169-180
ISSN: 0149-1970
In: Progress in nuclear energy: the international review journal covering all aspects of nuclear energy, Band 53, Heft 8, S. 1084-1090
ISSN: 0149-1970
In: Science and technology of nuclear installations, Band 2018, S. 1-10
ISSN: 1687-6083
The one-dimensional two-fluid model approach has been traditionally used in thermal-hydraulics codes for the analysis of transients and accidents in water–cooled nuclear power plants. This paper investigates the performance of RELAP5/MOD3 predicting vertical upward bubbly flow at low velocity conditions. For bubbly flow and vertical pipes, this code applies the drift-velocity approach, showing important discrepancies with the experiments compared. Then, we use a classical formulation of the drag coefficient approach to evaluate the performance of both approaches. This is based on the critical Weber criteria and includes several assumptions for the calculation of the interfacial area and bubble size that are evaluated in this work. A more accurate drag coefficient approach is proposed and implemented in RELAP5/MOD3. Instead of using the Weber criteria, the bubble size distribution is directly considered. This allows the calculation of the interfacial area directly from the definition of Sauter mean diameter of a distribution. The results show that only the proposed approach was able to predict all the flow characteristics, in particular the bubble size and interfacial area concentration. Finally, the computational results are analyzed and validated with cross-section area average measurements of void fraction, dispersed phase velocity, bubble size, and interfacial area concentration.
In: Science and technology of nuclear installations, Band 2012, S. 1-10
ISSN: 1687-6083
In nuclear safety analysis, it is very important to be able to simulate the different transients that can occur in a nuclear power plant with a very high accuracy. Although the best estimate codes can simulate the transients and provide realistic system responses, the use of nonexact models, together with assumptions and estimations, is a source of uncertainties which must be properly evaluated. This paper describes a Rod Ejection Accident (REA) simulated using the coupled code RELAP5/PARCSv2.7 with a perturbation on the cross-sectional sets in order to determine the uncertainties in the macroscopic neutronic information. The procedure to perform the uncertainty and sensitivity (U&S) analysis is a sampling-based method which is easy to implement and allows different procedures for the sensitivity analyses despite its high computational time. DAKOTA-Jaguar software package is the selected toolkit for the U&S analysis presented in this paper. The size of the sampling is determined by applying the Wilks' formula for double tolerance limits with a 95% of uncertainty and with 95% of statistical confidence for the output variables. Each sample has a corresponding set of perturbations that will modify the cross-sectional sets used by PARCS. Finally, the intervals of tolerance of the output variables will be obtained by the use of nonparametric statistical methods.
In: Progress in nuclear energy: the international review journal covering all aspects of nuclear energy, Band 53, Heft 8, S. 1167-1180
ISSN: 0149-1970