Suchergebnisse

This text sets out to present the cinematic representation of Pier Paolo Pasolini and Aldo Moro from the idea of the 'unburied corpse'. I propose here that, due to the circumstances of their deaths, the lifeless bodies of the filmmaker and the politician do not endorse their public identity but rather overflow and unfold it. Their corpses configured an identity of ordinary man that replaced the image of the public man in the Italian collective imagination and contended to the public character the space of representation. The text recovers some proposals of The Moro Affair (L'affaire Moro, Leonardo Sciascia, 1978) to reconstruct the links between these two protagonists of the intellectual and political life of the Years of Lead. I also analyze the way in which Italian cinema has attempted to interpret the split figures of Moro and Pasolini and their unburied corpses.

El artículo realiza un análisis crítico del pensamiento de la diferencia sexual italiano intentando averiguar en qué medida su propuesta político-teórica puede realmente configurarse, tal como anuncia, como discurso alternativo al feminismo de la igualdad, a saber, como discurso capaz de abarcar y dar voz al sujeto mujer y su deseo. En particular, por un lado, se analiza cómo de la alianza conceptual entre las denuncias de Luce Irigaray y el pensamiento político de Carla Lonzi ha surgido, en Italia, aquel conjunto de teoría y praxis que se ha llamado «política del deseo» y, por otro lado, se sigue el rastro del intenso debate teórico-político, originado por esta misma política, acerca del peligro de dogmatismo en el cual puede caer el discurso feminista si no acepta conservar y valorar sus propias contradicciones, fracasos e incluso sus propios silencios. ; This article offers a critical analysis of the Italian feminist theory of sexual difference, and explores to which extend its political and theoretical proposal can be considered, as it claims, as an alternative discourse to the paradigm of equality, that is, a discourse able to embrace and give voice to female subject and her desire. In particular, this paper first investigates how, in Italy, the combination of theory and practice called «politics of desire» derived from a conceptual alliance between Luce Irigaray's denounces and Carla Lonzi's political thought. Then, it follows the intense theoretical and political debate that this politics of desire generated inside Italian feminism concerning the risk of dogmatism for a feminist discourse which does not accept to keep and value its own contradictions, failures and even its own silences.

This article offers a critical analysis of the Italian feminist theory of sexual difference, and explores to which extend its political and theoretical proposal can be considered, as it claims, as an alternative discourse to the paradigm of equality, that is, a discourse able to embrace and give voice to female subject and her desire. In particular, this paper first investigates how, in Italy, the combination of theory and practice called «politics of desire» derived from a conceptual alliance between Luce Irigaray's denounces and Carla Lonzi's political thought. Then, it follows the intense theoretical and political debate that this politics of desire generated inside Italian feminism concerning the risk of dogmatism for a feminist discourse which does not accept to keep and value its own contradictions, failures and even its own silences. ; El artículo realiza un análisis crítico del pensamiento de la diferencia sexual italiano intentando averiguar en qué medida su propuesta político-teórica puede realmente configurarse, tal como anuncia, como discurso alternativo al feminismo de la igualdad, a saber, como discurso capaz de abarcar y dar voz al sujeto mujer y su deseo. En particular, por un lado, se analiza cómo de la alianza conceptual entre las denuncias de Luce Irigaray y el pensamiento político de Carla Lonzi ha surgido, en Italia, aquel conjunto de teoría y praxis que se ha llamado «política del deseo» y, por otro lado, se sigue el rastro del intenso debate teórico-político, originado por esta misma política, acerca del peligro de dogmatismo en el cual puede caer el discurso feminista si no acepta conservar y valorar sus propias contradicciones, fracasos e incluso sus propios silencios.