Suchergebnisse

Intro -- Acknowledgements -- Chapter 1 What Was Multiculturalism? -- Chapter 2 The Politics of Recognition -- Chapter 3 The Morally Required Versus the Morally Permissible: Joseph Carens -- Chapter 4 Absolute Tolerance: Chandran Kukathas and Jacques Derrida -- Chapter 5 The Politics of Compromise and the Inclusive Community -- Chapter 6 The Spectres of Class and the Figure of Woman -- Chapter 7 The Postcolonial Condition -- Chapter 8 The Radical Imaginary: Canada -- Chapter 9 Biculture or Multiculture: New Zealand -- Chapter 10 Multiculture: the Settler Ethos in Australia -- Chapter 11 Multicultural Testimonio -- Chapter 12 The Failure of Hybridity: the Rushdie Affair -- Chapter 13 After 9/11 and 7/7 -- Chapter 14 Conclusion: a Radical Humanism -- Selected Bibliography -- Index.

This essay deals with the manner in which Salman Rushdie's works engage with the heterogeneous logics of ethics and aesthetics. Drawing upon the work of Jacques Rancière it is argued that Rushdie neutralizes the two by introducing what Rancière calls a dissensus in the ethical-aesthetic hierarchy. The dissensus works on a principle of 'excess' so that within the domain of aesthetics the ethical is pushed to its limits. The order of desire (aesthetics) and the order of knowledge (ethics) are no longer seen as hierarchical and mutually exclusive categories. By examining two versions of an unpublished novel by Rushdie ('Madame Rama') it is suggested that Bollywood cinema functions as a mode in which the two orders come together. In this early and mercifully unpublished novel, one finds the beginnings of Rushdie's belief that works of art are sites of ideological and ethical contestations.

This paper re-thinks the current imperative to theorize the (white) nation-state as a 'multination,' one in which the grand narrative of a nation's founding communities (and the presumption of assimilation upon which the grand narrative was always based) gives way to a multiply centred narrative attuned to questions of unequal power relations, racism, exploitation and so on. Multiculturalism as a theory has arisen out of this shift and presents itself not as an explanatory model of a given situation but as a problematic in need of continuous theorization. The paper argues that multiculturalism remains a thing of the past, a way in which the project of the Enlightenment and matters of justice may be rethought (but not radically altered) so as to accommodate the 'alien' within. And it is for this reason – because of its pastness – that it requires constant critique and re-evaluation, the need to specify the real, material conditions of racism and their relation to capital at every point.

The paper aims to analyse legal lacunas and suggest possible solutions for the acts and wrongdoings of Private Military and Security Companies within the lens of maritime activities. The paper has been divided into three parts. Part I deals with the necessity and role of Private Military and Security Companies in the present times. Part II discusses the legal status of Private Military and Security Companies and ways of ensuring responsibility for their acts. Part III examines the legal framework for the acts of Private Maritime Security Companies. An assessment of the rules of international humanitarian law (IHL), state responsibility, applicability of the Montreux document and efforts such as GUARDCON have been discussed to highlight the inadequacy of the laws on Private Maritime Security Companies. There has been an upsurge in the employment of Private Maritime Security Companies since 2008 to cope with a myriad of problems at sea including piracy and robbery. However, an umbrella of rules including employment procedures, agreements, training techniques, responsibility in peacetime as well as in times of conflict and the guidelines of IHL must be restructured or enhanced in order to be made applicable to Private Maritime Security Companies.