Suchergebnisse

Introduction -- Public space and its transformation -- Exclusion from public space -- Rule of law -- Fundamental rights : liberty -- Fundamental rights : equality -- Democracy -- A right (of access) to public space? -- Synthesis -- Bibliography -- Annex i: overview of the most important exclusion norms -- Annex ii: typology of exclusion norms.

This text analyses the human rights impacts of anti-terrorism laws and practices post September 11th. It evaluates whether there are objective grounds for singling out people based on their nationality, national origin, race, or religion and argues that discriminatory anti-terrorism measures will fundamentally reshape these legal regimes

The Committee on the Elimination of Racial Discrimination (CERD) adopted General Recommendation No. 36 on Preventing and Combating Racial Profiling by Law Enforcement Officials at its 102nd session, which took place from November to December 2020.

AbstractThis response piece argues that one should be wary of generalised statements that referendums – or particular types of referendums – are good or bad. Whether a popular vote process has beneficial or damaging effects depends on a myriad of factors, in particular its formal design and the constitutional structure of the state concerned. Similarly, sweeping claims that referendums result in the oppression of minorities should be approached with a good dose of scepticism. A look at actual direct‐democratic practice shows that the danger of a tyranny of the majority is limited to very specific circumstances. Insofar as this danger does exist, damaging effects of referendums for minorities can be prevented through judicial review after the vote and exclusion of certain issues from referendums from the start.