Suchergebnisse

"A riveting first-hand account of one of the darker moments of Cold War espionage, with plenty of James Bondian flourishes: a CIA-backed spy mission to the roof of the world . . . snowstorms and deadly frostbite . . . and a missing nuclear-powered eavesdropping device that threatens to leak lethal contamination into the Ganges. What a ride!"-Frank Snepp, former CIA agent and author of Decent Interval and Irreparable Harm "A marvelously detailed account of one of the most exotic and hazardous intelligence operations of the Cold War. . . . A rare treat for anyone interested in mountaineering, secret intelligence, or tales of high adventure."-William M. Leary, author of Project Coldfeet: Secret Mission to a Soviet Ice Station "A lively and fascinating account that rivals Fleming and le Carré."-David Rudgers, author of Creating the Secret State.

The sciences and the humanities are treated as two incompatible discourses and the former enjoys a superior status both within and outside the academic society. This dominance of science as a discourse synonymous with knowledge while humanities and its methods are devaluated come from the assumption that scientific domain is a linear progression of facts discovered using a rational methodology. Thus, it's worthwhile to lay bare the ruptures and the remedial rhetoric that lie behind the façade of 'objectivity' and 'rationality' in science in order to revise the existing academic framework. My attempt here is to re-articulate the discourse of science as shaped and subject to elements traditionally thought to be extra scientific or even anti-scientific in the positivist notion of science. Drawing from the postpositivist philosophy of science put forth by Michael Polanyi, Thomas Kuhn and Paul Feyerabend which dismisses an objective methodology in science, this paper argues that rhetoric plays a constitutive role in scientific knowledge by making scientific progress possible. By establishing rhetoric rather than methodology as the decisive element in the advancement of science, the boundaries between science and non-science begin to blur.

After more than a hundred years, Singapore made major reforms to its bankruptcy laws in 1995. These changes attracted considerable public interest, with the Government taking pains to emphasise that the new law was designed to strike a balance between the interest of the debtor, the creditor and society. The greatest scrutiny of the provisions, to determine whether in law and in practice the competing interests of debtors and creditors could effectively be balanced, was in respect of the discharge provisions. In this article, the writer, who was then the Official Assignee, discusses how the novel remedy of discharge by certificate of the Official Assignee was conceived, drafted and successfully implemented.

AbstractThe performance of the modified upflow anaerobic sludge blanket (MUASB) reactor–static granular bed reactor (SGBR) series was evaluated during the restart after a starvation period of 6 months. The steady‐state chemical oxygen demand (COD) removal of the reactor series obtained during the restart with copper was 98 ± 1.96% with the corresponding biogas production and copper removal of 0.218‐m3/kg CODdigested and 81.5%, respectively. Even though the biogas production of the reactor series with copper decreased because of the inhibitory effect of the accumulated copper on the methanogens, the reactor series was maintained stable throughout the operation with the effluent characteristics well within the discharge standards. The resumption of feed after starvation was sufficient for the recovery of the biomass from a dormant to an active state when operated with and without copper. The restart of the reactor series with copper was achieved in 35 days, indicating robustness and sustainability even after starvation.