In: Ansiedad y Estrés: una revista multidisciplinar de psicología, medicina, neurociencias y ciencias sociales = Anxiety & stress : a multidisciplinary journal of psychology, medicine, neurosciences and social sciences, Band 25, Heft 2, S. 138-147
Introducción. La pandemia ocasionada por COVID-19 impacta en la salud psicológica, aumentando significativamente los niveles de estrés experimentados por las personas. Objetivo. Primero, analizar la relación entre variables sociodemográficas, poseer personas a cargo, pertenecer a población de riesgo (o tener alguien cercano que pertenezca) y el estrés percibido durante la pandemia ocasionada por COVID-19, en argentinos/as de 18 a 85 años. Segundo, explorar dichas relaciones durante los períodos de Aislamiento Social Preventivo y Obligatorio (ASPO) decretados por el gobierno de Argentina. Metodología. La muestra estuvo compuesta por 5512 personas que respondieron a la encuesta COVIDiSTRESS entre el 1 de abril y el 7 de junio. Resultados. Las personas más jóvenes, las mujeres, los/as desempleados, los/as que contaban con nivel educativo bajo, tenían personas a cargo o pertenecían a la población de riesgo (o tenían a alguien cercano que pertenezca) presentaron mayores niveles de estrés. En los períodos 2 y 3 de ASPO se observaron relaciones particulares entre el estrés y algunas variables sociodemográficas. Conclusiones. Se discuten los resultados a la luz de evidencias previas y se exponen consideraciones sobre la implicancia de los mismos en el campo de la salud mental. ; INTRODUCTION: The pandemic caused by COVID-19 impacts psychological health, significantly increasing the levels of perceivedstress. OBJECTIVE: First, we analyze the relationship between sociodemographic variables, dependents, risk population (or had someone close who belonged) and perceived stress during the pandemic, in Argentinean residents between 18 and 85 years old. Second, we explore those relationships during the periods of Preventive and Compulsory Social Isolation (ASPO, acronym in Spanish) decreed by the government of Argentina. METHOD: The sample consisted of 5512 people who completed the COVIDiSTRESS survey between April 1st and June 7th. RESULTS: The higher levels of stress were perceived by the youngest, the women, the unemployed, those with low educational levels, who had dependents and who belonged to the risk population (or had someone close who belonged). In periods 2 and 3 of the ASPO, we found specific relationships between perceived stress and some sociodemographic variables. CONCLUSSIONS: We discuss the results in the light of previous evidence and explain their implication in the field of mental health. ; publishedVersion ; Fil: Correa, Pablo Sebastián. Universidad Nacional de Córdoba. Facultad de Psicología; Argentina. ; Fil: Correa, Pablo Sebastián. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Instituto de Investigaciones Psicológicas; Argentina. ; Fil: Mola, Débora Jeanette. Universidad Nacional de Córdoba. Facultad de Psicología; Argentina. ; Fil: Mola, Débora Jeanette. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Instituto de Investigaciones Psicológicas; Argentina. ; Fil: Ortiz, María Victoria. Universidad Nacional de Córdoba. Facultad de Psicología; Argentina. ; Fil: Ortiz, María Victoria. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Instituto de Investigaciones Psicológicas; Argentina. ; Fil: Godoy, Juliana. Universidad Nacional de Córdoba. Facultad de Psicología; Argentina.
The pandemic caused by COVID-19 impacts psychological health, significantly increasing the levels of perceived stress. OBJECTIVE: First, we analyze the relationship between sociodemographic variables, dependents, risk population (or had someone close who belonged) and perceived stress during the pandemic, in Argentinean residents between 18 and 85 years old. Second, we explore those relationships during the periods of Preventive and Compulsory Social Isolation (ASPO, acronym in Spanish) decreed by the government of Argentina. METHOD: The sample consisted of 5512 people who completed the COVIDiSTRESS survey between April 1st and June 7th. RESULTS: The higher levels of stress were perceived by the youngest, the women, the unemployed, those with low educational levels, who had dependents and who belonged to the risk population (or had someone close who belonged). In periods 2 and 3 of the ASPO, we found specific relationships between perceived stress and some sociodemographic variables. CONCLUSSIONS: We discussthe results in the light of previous evidence and explain their implication in the field of mental health. ; Fil: Correa, Pablo Sebastián. Universidad Nacional de Córdoba. Instituto de Investigaciones Psicológicas. - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Córdoba. Instituto de Investigaciones Psicológicas; Argentina ; Fil: Mola, Débora Jeanette. Universidad Nacional de Córdoba. Instituto de Investigaciones Psicológicas. - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Córdoba. Instituto de Investigaciones Psicológicas; Argentina. Universidad Nacional de Córdoba. Facultad de Psicología; Argentina ; Fil: Ortiz, María Victoria. Universidad Nacional de Córdoba. Instituto de Investigaciones Psicológicas. - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Córdoba. Instituto de Investigaciones Psicológicas; Argentina ; Fil: Godoy, Juliana. Universidad Nacional de Córdoba. Facultad de Psicología; Argentina
INTRODUCCIÓN: La pandemia ocasionada por COVID-19 impacta en la salud psicológica, aumentando significativamente los niveles de estrés experimentados por las personas. OBJETIVO: Primero, analizar la relación entre variables sociodemográficas, poseer personas a cargo, pertenecer a población de riesgo (o tener alguien cercano que pertenezca) y el estrés percibido durante la pandemia ocasionada por COVID-19, en argentinos/as de 18 a 85 años. Segundo, explorar dichas relaciones durante los períodos de Aislamiento Social Preventivo y Obligatorio (ASPO) decretados por el gobierno de Argentina. MÉTODO: La muestra estuvo compuesta por 5512 personas que respondieron a la encuesta COVIDiSTRESS entre el 1 de abril y el 7 de junio. RESULTADOS: Las personas más jóvenes, las mujeres, los/as desempleados, los/as que contaban con nivel educativo bajo, tenían personas a cargo o pertenecían a la población de riesgo (o tenían a alguien cercano que pertenezca) presentaron mayores niveles de estrés. En los períodos 2 y 3 de ASPO se observaron relaciones particulares entre el estrés y algunas variables sociodemográficas. CONCLUSIONES: Discutimos los resultados a la luz de evidencias previas y se exponen consideraciones sobre la implicancia de los mismos en el campo de la salud mental.
The analysis of institutional innovations for channeling citizen participation allows us to recognize that they can be oriented towards the realization or reinforcement of very diverse and contrasting "societal" projects. In this paper, we propose to address different participatory instances through various theoretical-methodological approaches in order to provide evidence and contribute to the discussion. The selected cases correspond to institutional innovations that encourage individual or collective citizen participation and that are implemented at different levels of government with varied designs. For this purpose, we mainly consider how inclusive each of the instances analyzed are and whether they tend more towards strengthening representative government than towards the progressive installation of a more participatory conception of democracy. The evidence produced allows us to recognize that in the case of the JPV, the PP Barrial, JPC-CB and the application App Ciudadana, the centrality of the management undertaken by the representatives in the government is explicit, strengthening a representative conception of democracy at both levels of government. In the case of community-based cultural policies, the centrality of national and municipal management is not evident, rather it is concealed by the rhetoric of co-management. Plural participation in the framework of these policies has been restricted and depowered by institutional weakness, but also as a result of instrumental and corporate participation. In terms of epistemic diversity, these innovations as a whole fail to guarantee the inclusion of varied, open and accessible channels for people with different life trajectories, in all social positions, to publicly express their dissent. ; El análisis de las innovaciones institucionales para canalizar la participación ciudadana permite reconocer que pueden orientarse a la concreción o reforzamientos de proyectos "societales" muy diversos y contrastantes. En el presente trabajo nos proponemos abordar ...
Funder: Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnología (CONCYT); doi: https://doi.org/10.13039/501100007350 ; Funder: Research Foundation Flanders (FWO) postdoctoral fellowship ; Funder: The HSE University Basic Research Program ; Funder: JSPS KAKENHI Grant JP20K14222 ; Abstract: This N = 173,426 social science dataset was collected through the collaborative COVIDiSTRESS Global Survey – an open science effort to improve understanding of the human experiences of the 2020 COVID-19 pandemic between 30th March and 30th May, 2020. The dataset allows a cross-cultural study of psychological and behavioural responses to the Coronavirus pandemic and associated government measures like cancellation of public functions and stay at home orders implemented in many countries. The dataset contains demographic background variables as well as measures of Asian Disease Problem, perceived stress (PSS-10), availability of social provisions (SPS-10), trust in various authorities, trust in governmental measures to contain the virus (OECD trust), personality traits (BFF-15), information behaviours, agreement with the level of government intervention, and compliance with preventive measures, along with a rich pool of exploratory variables and written experiences. A global consortium from 39 countries and regions worked together to build and translate a survey with variables of shared interests, and recruited participants in 47 languages and dialects. Raw plus cleaned data and dynamic visualizations are available.