Les marchés de service public: un nouveau mode de gestion des services publics
In: Guides juridiques
In: Marchés publics
7 results
Sort by:
In: Guides juridiques
In: Marchés publics
In: Phenomenology and the cognitive sciences, Volume 14, Issue 2, p. 349-359
ISSN: 1572-8676
In: Marine corps gazette: the Marine Corps Association newsletter, Volume 88, Issue 1, p. 24-27
ISSN: 0025-3170
In: Marine corps gazette: the Marine Corps Association newsletter, Volume 87, Issue 1, p. 31-32
ISSN: 0025-3170
In: Journal of urban affairs, Volume 10, Issue 2, p. 119-139
ISSN: 1467-9906
In: Research integrity and peer review, Volume 9, Issue 1
ISSN: 2058-8615
AbstractJournal editors have a large amount of power to advance open science in their respective fields by incentivising and mandating open policies and practices at their journals. The Data PASS Journal Editors Discussion Interface (JEDI, an online community for social science journal editors: www.dpjedi.org) has collated several resources on embedding open science in journal editing (www.dpjedi.org/resources). However, it can be overwhelming as an editor new to open science practices to know where to start. For this reason, we created a guide for journal editors on how to get started with open science. The guide outlines steps that editors can take to implement open policies and practices within their journal, and goes through the what, why, how, and worries of each policy and practice. This manuscript introduces and summarizes the guide (full guide: https://doi.org/10.31219/osf.io/hstcx).
Changing collective behaviour and supporting non-pharmaceutical interventions is an important component in mitigating virus transmission during a pandemic. In a large international collaboration (Study 1, N = 49,968 across 67 countries), we investigated selfreported factors associated with public health behaviours (e.g., spatial distancing and stricter hygiene) and endorsed public policy interventions (e.g., closing bars and restaurants) during the early stage of the COVID-19 pandemic (April-May 2020). Respondents who reported identifying more strongly with their nation consistently reported greater engagement in public health behaviours and support for public health policies. Results were similar for representative and non-representative national samples. Study 2 (N = 42 countries) conceptually replicated the central finding using aggregate indices of national identity (obtained using the World Values Survey) and a measure of actual behaviour change during the pandemic (obtained from Google mobility reports). Higher levels of national identification prior to the pandemic predicted lower mobility during the early stage of the pandemic (r = −0.40). We discuss the potential implications of links between national identity, leadership, and public health for managing COVID-19 and future pandemics.
BASE