Suchergebnisse

"This book is an article by article account written on the Universal Declaration of Human Rights that aims to introduce this iconic text to a new generation of teachers, students, and activists who are seeking to defend our liberal democracies against autocratic populisms that threaten Western civilization as we know it"--

The 1948 Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR) is one of the most important and debated sociopolitical documents of the twentieth century. A leading authority on the UDHR, Johannes Morsink is the author of The Universal Declaration of Human Rights: Origins, Drafting, and Intent (2000) and Inherent Human Rights: Philosophical Roots of the Universal Declaration (2009). With this new book, Morsink has now written a volume for a new generation of human rights students and activists, one that presents an article-by-article account of the formulation of each article in the UDHR. The author comments perceptively on how they have been argued, argued over, and used in a wide range of political discourses. Comprised of short essays on each of the Declaration's thirty articles, this book constitutes the most accessible and comprehensive approach to this document and explicates the UDHR's continued relevance in contemporary times.Throughout the book, Morsink explains how this 1948 iconic text can help us in the twenty-first century. He shows us the high moral ground we need to fight evils perpetuated during and after World War II that now present themselves in new garb and does so in a clear and concise manner

Johannes Morsink argues that the 1948 UN Universal Declaration of Human Rights and the human rights movement today are direct descendants of revulsion to the Holocaust and the desire to never let it happen again. Much recent scholarship about human rights has severed this link between the Holocaust, the Universal Declaration, and contemporary human rights activism in favor of seeing the 1970s as the era of genesis. Morsink forcefully presents his case that the Universal Declaration was indeed a meaningful though underappreciated document for the human rights movement and that the declaration and its significance cannot be divorced from the Holocaust. He reexamines this linkage through the working papers of the commission that drafted the declaration as well as other primary sources. This work seeks to reset scholarly understandings of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and the foundations of the contemporary human rights movement

Contents -- Acknowledgments -- Introduction | The Declaration and Our Secular World Order -- Part One: Holocaust Origins -- Chapter One | Independent Access to Moral Basics -- Chapter Two | Statecraft and Religious Freedoms -- Part Two: Political Struggles with Religious Literalists -- Chapter Three | US Religiosity and the Duty of Civility -- Chapter Four | Islam and the Universal Declaration -- Part Three: A Deeper Dialogue -- Chapter Five | Secularism Defended -- Chapter Six | The Contribution of Religion -- Conclusion | Human Rights as an Independent Force in World Affairs -- Appendix | Tables -- Notes -- Bibliography -- Index

"The Universal Declaration of Human Rights, adopted in 1948, has become the moral backbone of more than two hundred human rights instruments that are now a part of our world. The document has been a source of hope and inspiration to thousands of groups and millions of oppressed individuals." "Johannes Morsink offers a behind-the-scenes account of the Declaration's origins and development. He reports on the detailed discussions that took place in the United Nations, tells us which countries argued for or against each provision of the Declaration, explains why certain important amendments were rejected, and shows how common revulsion toward the Holocaust provided the consensus needed to adopt this universal code of ethics."--Jacket

"In Inherent Human Rights: Philosophical Roots of the Universal Declaration, philosopher and political theorist Johannes Morsink offers an alternative to contemporary assumptions. A major historian of the Universal Declaration, Morsink traces the philosophical roots of the Declaration back to the Enlightenment and to a shared revulsion at the horrors of the Holocaust. He defends the Declaration's perspective that all people have human rights simply by virtue of being born into the human family and that human beings have these rights regardless of any government or court action (or inaction). Like mathematical principles, human rights are truly universal, not the products of a particular culture, economic scheme, or political system. Our understanding of their existence can be blocked only by madness and false ideologies. Morsink argues that the drafters of the Declaration shared this metaphysical view of human rights. By denying the inherence of human rights and their metaphysical nature, and removing the concepts of the Declaration from their historical and philosophical context, contemporary constructivist scholars and pragmatic activists create an unnecessary and potentially dangerous political fog. The book carefully dissects various human rights models and ends with a defense of the Declaration's cosmopolitan vision against charges of unrealistic utopianism and Western ethnocentrism." "Inherent Human Rights takes exception to the reigning view that the Golden Rule is the best defense of human rights. Instead, it calls for us to "follow the lead of the Declaration's drafters and liberate the idea of human rights from the realm of the political and the juridical, which is where contemporary theorists have imprisoned it.""--Jacket

An examination of the UN Charter, the 1948 Universal Declaration of Human Rights, examining the wording & resulting interpretations with respect to women's rights. The story of the drafting process is told with illustrative vignettes, referencing various participants' statements & dialogue with each other. Despite discussion, contention, & lobbying, linguistic sexism still exists in the finished document. Particularly problematic are: the reference to "all men" in Article 1, issues regarding the family & children in Articles 16 & 25, marriage & divorce in Article 16, & suffrage & pay in Articles 21 & 32. It is argued, however, that the Universal Declaration does not deny women's rights as individuals. C. Grindle