Unobserved Inputs in Household Production
In: Journal of political economy, Band 132, Heft 6, S. 1876-1896
ISSN: 1537-534X
28 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: Journal of political economy, Band 132, Heft 6, S. 1876-1896
ISSN: 1537-534X
In: Andrew Young School of Policy Studies Research Paper Series No. 17-04
SSRN
Working paper
In: Journal of Population Economics, Band 13, Heft 2
SSRN
In: The journal of human resources, Band XLI, Heft 2, S. 259-293
ISSN: 1548-8004
In: NBER Working Paper No. w7942
SSRN
In: Economic Development and Cultural Change, Band 44, Heft 1, S. 1-31
ISSN: 1539-2988
In: International journal of population data science: (IJPDS), Band 3, Heft 5
ISSN: 2399-4908
The benefits of a college education are well documented. However, the majority of existing research focuses on students who matriculate soon after high school graduation. There is little empirical evidence illustrating whether a college degree is similarly beneficial to those already in the workforce, particularly individuals over 50. Nonetheless, the coming years will see the dramatic growth of older individuals, many of whom will continue to be active in the labor force, and policymakers would benefit from effective strategies to improve the labor market outcomes of older individuals.
This research proposes to evaluate the labor market outcomes of individuals in Georgia who obtain a bachelor's degree at age 50 or older by merging state-level individual level labor force (Dpt of Labor) with individual level educational data from the University System of Georgia (USG). Specifically, we explore whether these later-age degrees result in employment opportunities with higher wages and increased retention in the labor force beyond the traditional retirement age of 65 than those who do not attain a bachelor's degree. The results will provide policymakers across the United States with information to make informed decisions regarding higher education incentives and policies for older students.
An extensive literature uses anthropometric measures, typically heights, to draw inferences about living standards in the past. This literature's influence reaches beyond economic history; the results of historical heights research appear as crucial components in development economics and related fields. The historical heights literature often relies on micro-samples drawn from sub-populations that are themselves selected: examples include volunteer soldiers, prisoners, and runaway slaves, among others. Contributors to the heights literature sometimes acknowledge that their samples might not be random draws from the population cohorts in question, but rely on normality alone to correct for potential selection into the sample. We use a simple Roy model to show that selection cannot be resolved simply by augmenting truncated samples for left-tail shortfall. Statistical tests for departures from normality cannot detect selection in Monte Carlo exercises for small to moderate levels of self-selection, obviating a standard test for selection in the heights literature. We show strong evidence of selection using micro-data on the heights of British soldiers in the late eighteen and nineteenth centuries. Consequently, widely accepted results in the literature may not reflect variations in living standards during a soldier's formative years; observed heights could be predominantly determined by the process determining selection into the sample. A survey of the current historical heights literature illustrates the problem for the three most common sources: military personnel, slaves, and prisoners.
BASE
In: Journal of development economics, Band 90, Heft 2, S. 209-230
ISSN: 0304-3878
In: Journal of development economics, Band 90, Heft 2, S. 209-230
ISSN: 0304-3878
World Affairs Online
In: The journal of economic history, Band 79, Heft 4, S. 1154-1175
ISSN: 1471-6372
Our 2017 article in this Journal stresses the pitfalls of using choice-based samples in economic history. A prominent example is the literature addressing the so-called antebellum puzzle. Heights researchers claim that Americans grew shorter in the first half of the nineteenth century, a period of robust economic growth. We argue that this result relies on choice-based samples. Without knowing the process that led to inclusion in the sample, researchers cannot properly estimate conditional mean heights. We proposed a diagnostic that can detect, but not correct for, selection bias. Komlos and A'Hearn's interpretation of our analysis confuses diagnosis with cure. We dispute their view that selection bias has been appreciated in the heights literature.
In: The journal of economic history, Band 77, Heft 1, S. 171-207
ISSN: 1471-6372
Understanding long-term changes in human well-being is central to understanding the consequences of economic development. An extensive anthropometric literature purports to show that heights in the United States declined between the 1830s and the 1890s, which is when the U.S. economy modernized. Most anthropometric research contends that declining heights reflect the negative health consequences of industrialization and urbanization. This interpretation, however, relies on sources subject to selection bias. Our meta-analysis shows that the declining height during industrialization emerges primarily in selected samples. We also develop a parsimonious diagnostic test that reveals, but does not correct for, selection bias in height samples. When applied to four representative height samples, the diagnostic provides compelling evidence of selection.
In: NBER Working Paper No. w21249
SSRN
In: NBER Working Paper No. w19955
SSRN
In: Yale Economics Department Working Paper No. 114
SSRN
Working paper