Suchergebnisse

Malaysia provides an interesting case study of the challenges of refugee integration, and the considerable implications of a country continuing to host refugees outside a refugee law framework and without a consistent refugee policy. The Malaysian government has not signed the 1951 United Nations Convention Relating to the Status of Refugees, nor its 1967 Protocol, and is therefore under no obligation to comply with the substantive provisions of it. It has neither implemented relevant legislation nor consistent policy measures to (a) administer refugee status or (b) adequately meet refugees' protection needs. Consequently, with the tacit agreement of the Malaysian government, the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR) carries out a significant role in the provision of protection activities in the country – along with civil society groups, non-governmental organisations (NGOs) and community-based organisations (CBOs). This paper examines the policy context for refugees in Malaysia, unpacking (a) key challenges faced by refugees in the country, (b) the lessons that can be learned from current ways of working with refugees in non-camp/urban settings, and (c) how policy measures can be strengthened to most effectively protect refugees in the medium- to long-term and, essentially, to foster integration. The paper first considers the history of refugees in Malaysia, and current drivers of flight, before turning to legislation on, and policy implications for, the protection space. Why Malaysia becomes a destination country at all and the (in)formal structures in place to assist integration are discussed, with specific attention paid to the challenges and opportunities presented in urban environments. The paper concludes by providing key recommendations for development practitioners, researchers and policy-makers in the strengthening of refugee protection in Malaysia.

Malaysia provides an interesting case study of the challenges of refugee integration, and the considerable implications of a country continuing to host refugees outside a refugee law framework and without a consistent refugee policy. The Malaysian government has not signed the 1951 United Nations Convention Relating to the Status of Refugees, nor its 1967 Protocol, and is therefore under no obligation to comply with the substantive provisions of it. It has neither implemented relevant legislation nor consistent policy measures to (a) administer refugee status or (b) adequately meet refugees' protection needs. Consequently, with the tacit agreement of the Malaysian government, the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR) carries out a significant role in the provision of protection activities in the country – along with civil society groups, non-governmental organisations (NGOs) and community-based organisations (CBOs).This paper examines the policy context for refugees in Malaysia, unpacking (a) key challenges faced by refugees in the country, (b) the lessons that can be learned from current ways of working with refugees in non-camp/urban settings, and (c) how policy measures can be strengthened to most effectively protect refugees in the medium- to long-term and, essentially, to foster integration.The paper first considers the history of refugees in Malaysia, and current drivers of flight, before turning to legislation on, and policy implications for, the protection space. Why Malaysia becomes a destination country at all and the (in)formal structures in place to assist integration are discussed, with specific attention paid to the challenges and opportunities presented in urban environments. The paper concludes by providing key recommendations for development practitioners, researchers and policy-makers in the strengthening of refugee protection in Malaysia.

Organizations working with refugees are increasingly using information communication technologies (ICTs) in their work. While there is a rich literature in the field of media and communications studies exploring how refugees use ICTs to meet their social and economic needs, this article focuses on whether and how refugees' ICT use maps onto the policy concept of refugee self-reliance, focusing on the economic, educational, administrative, health, and security/protection domains of self-reliance in informal urban settings. Building on the literature on refugees' ICT use, we use semi-structured interviews with urban refugees in Malaysia to understand how they use technology in their daily lives and whether these refugees' digital practices support self-reliance. We also interviewed practitioners from the Malaysian United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees office and non-governmental organization (NGO) sectors to better understand such institutions' strategies for using ICTs to deliver economic, educational, administrative, health, and protection programs in local refugee communities. Our findings are twofold: refugees' use of ICTs represented idiosyncratic ways of achieving self-reliance, but when institutions tried to implement ICT solutions to support refugee self-reliance at a population level, refugees either did not use these ICT solutions or were critical of the institutional solutions. The findings presented here have import for not only research on refugee self-reliance and ICTs but also the wider migration field, as organizations, such as the International Organization for Migration and national immigration authorities, integrate ICTs into processes that affect migrants' and displaced peoples' economic, social, and political inclusion in cities of arrival.