The Use of Force in UN Peacekeeping
In: Global Institutions
Cover -- Half Title -- Title Page -- Copyright Page -- Table of Contents -- List of illustrations -- Acknowledgments -- List of contributors -- Non-UN acronyms -- UN acronyms -- Introduction -- Questions of doctrine -- Questions of practice -- Conclusion -- Notes -- PART I: Questions of doctrine -- 1. The case of East Timor: Ancient history or the shape of things to come? -- Deployment of InterFET -- From InterFET to UNTAET -- Resurgence of violence -- The legal debates -- Brahimi and HIPPO on the use of force -- Politics and the use of force -- Jakarta elites -- Indonesian military leadership -- Former East Timor militia -- Role of international institutions -- Conclusion -- Notes -- 2. Action adapted to circumstance: Peacekeeping doctrine and the use of force -- The nature of military doctrine -- Prodding the middle ground -- Peace support operations (PSO) doctrine -- UN peacekeeping doctrine -- Joint Doctrine Note 5/11 -- Conclusion -- Notes -- 3. Between absolute war and absolute peacekeeping: The question of the use of force in peacekeeping -- Peacekeeping and the importance of the notion of the enemy -- The use of force in peacekeeping: From traditional peacekeeping to robust peacekeeping and the responsibility to protect -- Going beyond Clausewitz: Theoretically coping with the question of the use of force in peacekeeping -- The question of the enemy -- The dialectic between absolute peacekeeping and absolute war -- The use of force as a function of the political objectives of the international community -- The tertiary trinity -- Friction and other intangibles -- The theoretical framework: A synthesis -- Conclusion -- Disclaimer -- Notes -- 4. Is stabilization the new normal? Implications of stabilization mandates for the use of force in UN peacekeeping operations -- What does stabilization mean in the UN context and why does it matter?