Re-enchanting the Delhi Ridge
In: Conservation & society: an interdisciplinary journal exploring linkages between society, environment and development, Band 20, Heft 1, S. 56
ISSN: 0975-3133
30 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: Conservation & society: an interdisciplinary journal exploring linkages between society, environment and development, Band 20, Heft 1, S. 56
ISSN: 0975-3133
In: Conservation ecology: a peer-reviewed journal ; a publication of the Ecological Society of America, Band 3, Heft 2
ISSN: 1195-5449
In: Conservation & society: an interdisciplinary journal exploring linkages between society, environment and development, Band 6, Heft 3, S. 274
ISSN: 0975-3133
'Nature in the City' examines the past, present and future of nature in Bengaluru, one of India's largest cities. Integrating research with stories of people and places, it presents an accessible and informative story of a city where nature thrives and strives.
In: Ecology and society: E&S ; a journal of integrative science for resilience and sustainability, Band 16, Heft 2
ISSN: 1708-3087
Human-induced causes of forest change occur at multiple scales. Yet, most governance mechanisms are designed at a single level – whether international, national, regional or local – and do not provide effective solutions for the overarching challenge of forest governance. Efforts to "decentralize" governmental arrangements frequently do not recognize the importance of complex, polycentric arrangements and are based on a presumption of a single government at one level taking charge of a policy arena, often ignoring the existence of many vibrant self-governed institutions. Polycentric institutions provide a useful framework for governance, enabling aspects of preferred solutions to be used together in efforts to protect the long-term sustainability of diverse forested social-ecological systems. By considering the interaction between actors at different levels of governance, polycentricity contributes to a more nuanced understanding of the variation in diverse governance outcomes in the management of common-pool resources based on the needs and interests of citizens and the complexity of resources and governance systems at local, regional, national, and global levels. In this paper, we discuss challenges to polycentricity such as the matching of the boundaries of those who benefit, those who contribute with the boundary of the resource. We describe some approaches that have been effectively utilized to address these challenges in forests in various parts of the world. We also provide a brief overview of how the concept of polycentricity helps in the analysis of climate change and the closely related international effort to reduce greenhouse gas emissions through degradation and deforestation (REDD).
BASE
Human-induced causes of forest change occur at multiple scales. Yet, most governance mechanisms are designed at a single level – whether international, national, regional or local – and do not provide effective solutions for the overarching challenge of forest governance. Efforts to "decentralize" governmental arrangements frequently do not recognize the importance of complex, polycentric arrangements and are based on a presumption of a single government at one level taking charge of a policy arena, often ignoring the existence of many vibrant self-governed institutions. Polycentric institutions provide a useful framework for governance, enabling aspects of preferred solutions to be used together in efforts to protect the long-term sustainability of diverse forested social-ecological systems. By considering the interaction between actors at different levels of governance, polycentricity contributes to a more nuanced understanding of the variation in diverse governance outcomes in the management of common-pool resources based on the needs and interests of citizens and the complexity of resources and governance systems at local, regional, national, and global levels. In this paper, we discuss challenges to polycentricity such as the matching of the boundaries of those who benefit, those who contribute with the boundary of the resource. We describe some approaches that have been effectively utilized to address these challenges in forests in various parts of the world. We also provide a brief overview of how the concept of polycentricity helps in the analysis of climate change and the closely related international effort to reduce greenhouse gas emissions through degradation and deforestation (REDD).
BASE
In: Environmental management: an international journal for decision makers, scientists, and environmental auditors, Band 48, Heft 4, S. 781-794
ISSN: 1432-1009
In: Environmental management: an international journal for decision makers, scientists, and environmental auditors, Band 41, Heft 5, S. 719-733
ISSN: 1432-1009
In: The round table: the Commonwealth journal of international affairs, Band 110, Heft 5, S. 575-586
ISSN: 1474-029X
In: The round table: the Commonwealth journal of international affairs, Band 110, Heft 5, S. 575-586
ISSN: 0035-8533
World Affairs Online
In: Ecology and society: E&S ; a journal of integrative science for resilience and sustainability, Band 19, Heft 2
ISSN: 1708-3087
Governing natural resources sustainably is a continuing struggle. Major debates occur over what types of policy "interventions" best protect forests, with choices of property and land tenure systems being central issues. Herein, we provide an overview of findings from a long-term interdisciplinary, multiscale, international research program that analyzes the institutional factors affecting forests managed under a variety of tenure arrangements. This program analyzes satellite images, conducts social-ecological measurements on the ground, and tests the impact of structural variables on human decisions in experimental laboratories. Satellite images track the landscape dimensions of forest-cover change within different management regimes over time. On-the-ground social-ecological studies examine relationships between forest conditions and types of institutions. Behavioral studies under controlled laboratory conditions enhance our understanding of explicit changes in structure that affect relevant human decisions. Evidence from all three research methods challenges the presumption that a single governance arrangement will control overharvesting in all settings. When users are genuinely engaged in decisions regarding rules affecting their use, the likelihood of them following the rules and monitoring others is much greater than when an authority simply imposes rules. Our results support a frontier of research on the most effective institutional and tenure arrangements for protecting forests. They move the debate beyond the boundaries of protected areas into larger landscapes where government, community, and comanaged protected areas are embedded and help us understand when and why deforestation and regrowth occur in specific regions within these larger landscapes.
BASE
In: Ecology and society: E&S ; a journal of integrative science for resilience and sustainability, Band 10, Heft 1
ISSN: 1708-3087
In: Environmental management: an international journal for decision makers, scientists, and environmental auditors, Band 55, Heft 6, S. 1390-1401
ISSN: 1432-1009