Suchergebnisse

ResumeThis article provides reflexions on the prospects of feminism in the context of the current neoliberal capitalism crisis. It is based on the theories of Karl Polanyi, which explained the historical process of the crisis by the central conflict between the two strands of merchandisation and social protection. However, it concealed forms of injustice that are not based on walking and tended to dissolve forms of social protection that are vectors of domination. This article elarges the analysis of the conflict between merchandisation and social protection by integrating a third strand, the empowerment, through which all conflicts pass. The introduction of this missing third party has the effect of transforming the dual movement into a threefold movement, which forms the heart of a quasi-polanian perspective that could explain the crisis in the 21st side.In the first instance, I am working to build this new perspective and, in a second stage, I look at the issues at stake in the empowerment of gender diversity. The triple movement thus makes it possible to overcome the ambivalences of feminism, whose reflections have often been instrumentalised by triomphant neoliberalism. The reownership of social protection defined by democratic objectives, which are therefore participatory and therefore non-optional, thus paves the way for the definition of a new female policy. ; ResumeCet article presente des reflexions sur les perspectives du feminisme dans le cadre de la crise actuelle du capitalisme neoliberal. Il se fonde sur les theories de Karl Polanyi, qui expliquait le processus historique de la crise par le conflit central entre deux axes, celui de la marchandisation et celui de la protection sociale. Mais il occultait les formes d'injustice qui ne reposent pas sur le marche et avait tendance a absoudre les formes de protection sociale qui sont des vecteurs de domination. Cet article elargit les analyses du conflit entre marchandisation et protection sociale en integrant un troisieme axe, l'emancipation, par ...

Is Habermas's concept of the public sphere still relevant in an age of globalization, when the transnational flows of people and information have become increasingly intensive and when the nation-state can no longer be taken granted as the natural frame for social and political debate? This is the question posed with characteristic acuity by Nancy Fraser in her influential article 'Transnationalizing the Public Sphere?' Challenging careless uses of the term 'global public sphere', Fraser raises the debate about the nature and role of the public sphere in a global age to a new level. While drawing on the richness of Habermas's conception and remaining faithful to the spirit of critical theory, Fraser thoroughly reconstructs the concepts of inclusion, legitimacy and efficacy for our globalizing times. This book includes Fraser's original article as well as specially commissioned contributions that raise searching questions about the theoretical assumptions and empirical grounds of Fraser's argument. They are concerned with the fundamental premises of Habermas's development of the concept of the public sphere as a normative ideal in complex societies; the significance of the fact that the public sphere emerged in modern states that were also imperial; whether 'scaling up' to a global public sphere means giving up on local and national publics; the role of 'counterpublics' in developing alternative globalization; and what inclusion might possibly mean for a global public. Fraser responds to these questions in detail in an extended reply to her critics. An invaluable resource for students and scholars concerned with the role of the public sphere beyond the nation-state, this book will also be welcomed by anyone interested in globalization and democracy today. Nancy Fraser is Henry A. and Louise Loeb Professor of Political and Social Science and Department Chair at the New School for Social Research. Kate Nash is Joint Director of the Centre for the Study of Global Media and Democracy at Goldsmiths, University of London, and a Fellow of the Center for Cultural Sociology at Yale University.

Neste artigo, Nancy Fraser passa em revista a falência do modelo politicamente hegemônico de uma aliança entre uma versão progressiva das políticas de reconhecimento e uma versão regres- siva da política econômica, chamada por ela de neoliberalismo progressista. Frente à emergência de uma versão hiperreacionária do neoliberalismo, simbolizada por Donald Trump, a autora defende a ideia de uma versão progressista do populismo como ator contra-hegemônico no atual contexto social.

Nesse ensaio, Fraser elabora uma reflexão sobre a justiça a partir dos escritos de Platão, Rawls e Ishiguro. Por meio de uma análise crítica de Não me abandone jamais, Fraser procura extrair do romance de Ishiguro proposições práticas para nossa realidade cotidiana. Segundo a autora, uma sociedade justa deve desconstruir mecanismos sociais excludentes que, ao restringir o âmbito dos sujeitos de justiça a apenas um grupo social, impedem o tratamento equânime de todas as pessoas.