Suchergebnisse

1 Introduction -- 2 Myth, Identity, Order -- 3 Peace and Liberty: The Public Order Act 1936 -- 4 Race and Order: Stirring Up Racial Hatred -- 5 Class and Control: The Public Order Act 1986 -- 6 Being and Believing: Stirring Up Religious Hatred -- 7 Progress and Tradition: Stirring Up Hatred on Grounds of Sexual Orientation -- 8 Conclusions: From Myth to Fantasy.

The implications of specifying certain identity categories have been widely debated in the context of hate crime laws and policies. However, they have been less thoroughly examined in the particular contexts of hate speech. Although the majority of laws regulating speech do not differentiate between identity categories, the 'stirring up' offences of the United Kingdom Public Order Act 1986 are stratified along grounds of race, religion and sexual orientation. This article argues that, while the concerns raised about identity categories in relation to hate crime legislation are equally relevant to the stirring up provisions, the proposed solutions cannot automatically be transposed to hate speech offences. Accordingly, this article explores challenges that are encountered in attempts to make hate crime and hate speech legislation more inclusive before advancing some tentative suggestions for how hate speech laws might move beyond identity silos.

The implications of specifying certain identity categories have been widely debated in the context of hate crime laws and policies. However, they have been less thoroughly examined in the particular contexts of hate speech. Although the majority of laws regulating speech do not differentiate between identity categories, the 'stirring up' offences of the United Kingdom Public Order Act 1986 are stratified along grounds of race, religion and sexual orientation. This article argues that, while the concerns raised about identity categories in relation to hate crime legislation are equally relevant to the stirring up provisions, the proposed solutions cannot automatically be transposed to hate speech offences. Accordingly, this article explores challenges that are encountered in attempts to make hate crime and hate speech legislation more inclusive before advancing some tentative suggestions for how hate speech laws might move beyond identity silos.

The implications of specifying certain identity categories have been widely debated in the context of hate crime laws and policies. However, they have been less thoroughly examined in the particular contexts of hate speech. Although the majority of laws regulating speech do not differentiate between identity categories, the 'stirring up' offences of the United Kingdom Public Order Act 1986 are stratified along grounds of race, religion and sexual orientation. This article argues that, while the concerns raised about identity categories in relation to hate crime legislation are equally relevant to the stirring up provisions, the proposed solutions cannot automatically be transposed to hate speech offences. Accordingly, this article explores challenges that are encountered in attempts to make hate crime and hate speech legislation more inclusive before advancing some tentative suggestions for how hate speech laws might move beyond identity silos.

The implications of specifying certain identity categories have been widely debated in the context of hate crime laws and policies. However, they have been less thoroughly examined in the particular contexts of hate speech. Although the majority of laws regulating speech do not differentiate between identity categories, the 'stirring up' offences of the United Kingdom Public Order Act 1986 are stratified along grounds of race, religion and sexual orientation. This article argues that, while the concerns raised about identity categories in relation to hate crime legislation are equally relevant to the stirring up provisions, the proposed solutions cannot automatically be transposed to hate speech offences. Accordingly, this article explores challenges that are encountered in attempts to make hate crime and hate speech legislation more inclusive before advancing some tentative suggestions for how hate speech laws might move beyond identity silos.

An introduction to the European Union -- Institutions of the European Union -- Sources of European Union law (including general principles of law and fundamental rights) -- Competences and supremacy of the Union -- Judicial methodology and preliminary rulings of the Court of Justice -- Judicial review of the legality of Union acts -- Enforcement proceedings against member states -- Direct effect, indirect effect and state liability -- European Union citizenship and free movement rights -- Free movement of workers -- Freedom of establishment and the free movement of services -- Free movement of goods

An introduction to the European Union -- Institutions of the European Union -- Sources of European Union law (including general principles of law and fundamental rights) -- Competences and supremacy of the Union -- Judicial methodology and preliminary rulings of the Court of Justice -- Review of the legality of Union acts -- Infringement proceedings against member states -- Direct effect, indirect effect and state liability -- European Union citizenship and free movement rights -- Free movement of workers -- Freedom of establishment and the free movement of services -- Free movement of goods.