The urgent need to enhance sustainable development in developing countries has never been greater: poverty levels are growing, land conversions are uncontrolled, and there is rapid loss of biodiversity through land use change. This important and timely book highlights the need for integrated assessment tools for developing countries, considering the long-term impacts of decisions taken today. The success of land use policies has in the past often been hampered by the fact that we simply do not know enough about their impact on sustainable development across developing countries. This book cont
Zugriffsoptionen:
Die folgenden Links führen aus den jeweiligen lokalen Bibliotheken zum Volltext:
The report deals with HP management issues in Norway to provide a basis for exchange of experiences. The focus and level of detail in the report is based on dialogue with the Bulgarian partners to ensure relevance. The applicability of the studied practices should be closely examined and adaptation must take the national specifics into consideration for adoption in Bulgaria. The HP developments in Norway is largely dependent on country-specific favorable natural conditions and the transferal of experience to countries with different natural, social and economic context must be handled carefully. However, certain approaches and principles of sustainable HP development in Norway are generally valid and could be useful as references. In particular we assume that the processes and the approaches of some framework plans, and the licensing systems are of particular relevance. Particularly the integration in time and place of the implementation of the Water Framework Directive and the extensive revision of licenses for older HP plants are relevant information. The environmental/ecological criteria related to HP development vary over time and with the type of management tool, and is to a great extent related to water management priorities. A national approach is recommended for Bulgaria, taking into account the environmental objectives for the rivers, set by WFD and other regulatory documents. Currently in Norway the most important mitigation measures include demand for environmental flow or minimum flow, restrictions on regulation heights of dams, release of fish, fish passes in Power station, construction of thresholds and habitat adjustments. The general approach of selection and implementation of the mitigation measures is applicable outside Norway, bu the design of measures must be adapted to the specific habitat and species needs ; The Regional Environmental Center for Central and Eastern Europe (REC) – Branch Bulgaria In cooperation with: Eastern Aagean River Basin Directorate (EARBD) –Plovdiv Western Aagean River Basin Directorate (WARBD) - Blagoevgrand
Solutions to current complex environmental challenges demand the consultation and involvement of various groups in society. In light of the WFD's requirements of public participation, this paper presents an analysis of the establishment and development of nine different multi-actor platforms (MAPs) across Europe set up as arenas for long-term engagements to solve water quality challenges in relation to agriculture. The MAPs represent different histories and legacies of engagement; some are recent initiatives and some are affiliated with previous government-initiated projects, while other MAPs are long-term engagement platforms. A case study approach drawing on insights from the nine engagement processes is used to discuss conditions for enabling long-term multi-actor engagement. The perceived pressure for change and preferred prioritization in complying with mitigating water quality problems vary within and among the MAPs. The results show that governmental and local actors' concern for water quality improvements and focusing on pressure for change are important for establishing meaningful multi-actor engagement when concerns translate into a clear mandate of the MAP. Furthermore, the degree to which the MAPs have been able to establish relationships and networks with other institutions such as water companies, agricultural and environmental authorities, farmers, and civil society organizations influences possibilities for long-term meaningful engagement. ; publishedVersion
In: Nesheim , I , Sundnes , F , Enge , C , Graversgaard , M , van den Brink , C , Farrow , L , Glavan , M , Hansen , B , Leitão , I A , Rowbottom , J & Tendler , L 2021 , ' Multi-actor platforms in the water–agriculture nexus : Synergies and long-term meaningful engagement ' , Water , vol. 13 , no. 22 , 3204 . https://doi.org/10.3390/w13223204
Solutions to current complex environmental challenges demand the consultation and involvement of various groups in society. In light of the WFD's requirements of public participation, this paper presents an analysis of the establishment and development of nine different multi-actor platforms (MAPs) across Europe set up as arenas for long-term engagements to solve water quality challenges in relation to agriculture. The MAPs represent different histories and legacies of engagement; some are recent initiatives and some are affiliated with previous government-initiated projects, while other MAPs are long-term engagement platforms. A case study approach drawing on insights from the nine engagement processes is used to discuss conditions for enabling long-term multi-actor engagement. The perceived pressure for change and preferred prioritization in complying with mitigating water quality problems vary within and among the MAPs. The results show that governmental and local actors' concern for water quality improvements and focusing on pressure for change are important for establishing meaningful multi-actor engagement when concerns translate into a clear mandate of the MAP. Furthermore, the degree to which the MAPs have been able to establish relationships and networks with other institutions such as water companies, agricultural and environmental authorities, farmers, and civil society organizations influences possibilities for long-term meaningful engagement.
Over the last decades, nutrients and pesticides have proved to be a major source of the pollution of drinking water resources in Europe. Extensive legislation has been developed by the EU to protect drinking water resources from agricultural pollution, but the achievement of water quality objectives is still an ongoing challenge throughout Europe. The study aims to identify lessons that can be learnt about the coherence and consistency of the application of EU regulations, and their effects at the local level, using qualitative expert data for 13 local to regional governance arrangements in 11 different European countries. The results show that the complexities and inconsistencies of European legislation drawn up to protect drinking water resources from agricultural pollution come forward most explicitly at local level where cross-sectoral measures have to be taken and effects monitored. At this local level, rather than facilitate, they hamper efforts to achieve water quality objectives. The upcoming revision of the Water Framework Directive (WFD) should strengthen the links between the different directives and how they could be applied at local level. In addition, a more facilitated cross-sectoral approach should be adopted to improve stakeholder networks, between institutional levels and hydrological scales, to attain policy objectives at local level. ; publishedVersion
In: Wuijts , S , Claessens , J , Farrow , L , Doody , D G , Klages , S , Christophoridis , C , Cvejić , R , Glavan , M , Nesheim , I , Platjouw , F , Wright , I , Rowbottom , J , Graversgaard , M , van den Brink , C , Leitão , I , Ferreira , A & Boekhold , S 2021 , ' Protection of drinking water resources from agricultural pressures : Effectiveness of EU regulations in the context of local realities ' , Journal of Environmental Management , vol. 287 , 112270 , pp. 112270 . https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.112270
Over the last decades, nutrients and pesticides have proved to be a major source of the pollution of drinking water resources in Europe. Extensive legislation has been developed by the EU to protect drinking water resources from agricultural pollution, but the achievement of water quality objectives is still an ongoing challenge throughout Europe. The study aims to identify lessons that can be learnt about the coherence and consistency of the application of EU regulations, and their effects at the local level, using qualitative expert data for 13 local to regional governance arrangements in 11 different European countries. The results show that the complexities and inconsistencies of European legislation drawn up to protect drinking water resources from agricultural pollution come forward most explicitly at local level where cross-sectoral measures have to be taken and effects monitored. At this local level, rather than facilitate, they hamper efforts to achieve water quality objectives. The upcoming revision of the Water Framework Directive (WFD) should strengthen the links between the different directives and how they could be applied at local level. In addition, a more facilitated cross-sectoral approach should be adopted to improve stakeholder networks, between institutional levels and hydrological scales, to attain policy objectives at local level.
Over the last decades, nutrients and pesticides have proved to be a major source of the pollution of drinking water resources in Europe. Extensive legislation has been developed by the EU to protect drinking water resources from agricultural pollution, but the achievement of water quality objectives is still an ongoing challenge throughout Europe. The study aims to identify lessons that can be learnt about the coherence and consistency of the application of EU regulations, and their effects at the local level, using qualitative expert data for 13 local to regional gover-nance arrangements in 11 different European countries. The results show that the complexities and inconsistencies of European legislation drawn up to protect drinking water resources from agricultural pollution come forward most explicitly at local level where cross- sectoral measures have to be taken and effects monitored. At this local level, rather than facilitate, they hamper efforts to achieve water quality objectives. The upcoming revision of the Water Framework Directive (WFD) should strengthen the links between the different directives and how they could be applied at local level. In addition, a more facilitated cross-sectoral approach should be adopted to improve stakeholder networks, between institutional levels and hydrological scales, to attain policy objectives at local level.