Suchergebnisse
Filter
133 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
New York University review of law and social change
New York University journal of international law and politics: JILP
The New Yorker : the New York University weekly
Issues for Nov. 14, 1907-June 7, 1910 published in magazine format; Oct. 17, 1910-May 17, 1910 in newspaper format. ; Title from cover. ; "A weekly journal devoted to the interests of the students and alumni of New York University." ; Suspended publication fall 1918. ; Mode of access: Internet. ; Issued temporarily during fall 1918 suspension: Military violet. ; Merged with: New York University news, to form: New York University daily news (1922).
BASE
Dis/closures: women's autobiography in Germany between 1790 and 1914
In: New York University Ottendorfer series N.F., 24
RightwingLinks 1.1
RightWingLinks is a dataset comprised of 85,792 links to web pages on 4,538 different pay-level domains, which we extracted from 82,109 comments by 33,651 users on the public Facebook pages of the major established German political parties, the AfD party and the rightwing protest movement Pegida in the year 2015. The data is aggregated and contains synthetic identifiers.
GESIS
Time for a new approach to severe traumatic brain injury and stroke: Developments in automated, real-time monitoring of brain stem function
In: Research outreach: connecting science with society, Heft 105, S. 26-29
ISSN: 2517-7028
¿Precluyen a la justicia las amnistías? ; Do Amnesties Preclude Justice?
Una tendencia común entre los procesos de paz recientes es el uso de acuerdos de amnistía como mecanismos para restablecer el imperio de la ley y devolver la democracia al país. Sin embargo, la comunidad internacional sigue siendo renuente a aprobar su uso. Tanto los defensores de los derechos humanos y las organizaciones internacionales se han opuesto vehementemente a la elección de los acuerdos de amnistía, pues son vistos como cortinas de humo que promueven la impunidad. Pero para otros, los acuerdos de amnistía siguen siendo una forma legítima, plausible e incluso aceptada por el Derecho Internacional para lograr la paz e incluso lograr niveles de justicia en sociedades en transición. El propósito de este trabajo es examinar "la cuestión paradójica" sobre si los acuerdos de amnistía exigen la paz a expensas de la justicia. En concreto, se pretende estudiar si los acuerdos de amnistía pueden ayudar o contribuir en el logro de la justicia, especialmente cuando dichos acuerdos se complementan con mecanismos alternativos de justicia tales como comisiones de la verdad, reparaciones y reformas institucionales. El primer acápite de este artículo abordará la definición de los acuerdos de amnistía, el segundo mostrará el percepción cambiante que la comunidad internacional les ha dado; el tercer acápite propone una definición de justicia que se utilizará para fines de este documento; y el acápite final analizará el caso de Sudáfrica y el caso de Timor Oriental como dos ejemplos diferentes de cómo se puede aplicar la amnistía en los procesos de paz. Lo anterior, con el fin de determinar hasta qué punto ambos países lograron, a pesar de los acuerdos de amnistía, brindarle justicia a sus ciudadanos. ; A common trend among recent peace processes is the use of amnesty agreements as a mechanism to restore the rule of law and bring democracy back to the country. However, the international community is still reluctant to endorse them. Both human rights advocates and international organizations such as the United Nations have vehemently opposed the choice of amnesty. However, for others, amnesty agreements are still a legitimate and plausible way to achieve peace and even justice. Thus, the purpose of this paper is to examine the "paradoxical question" of whether amnesty agreements require peace at the expense of justice. Specifically, it purports to study whether amnesty agreements can aid or contribute in the achievement of justice, especially when the agreement is coupled by alternative justice mechanisms, such as truth commissions, reparations, and vetting. Section 1 of this paper will address the definition of amnesty agreements; section 2 will approach the "changing" perception the international community has given to them; section 3 will propose a definition of justice to be used for purposes of this paper; and section 4 will analyze the South African and the East Timor case, as two different examples of how amnesties can be applied in peace processes and to what extent both countries accomplished to bring justice to their people. The cases of South Africa, East Timor were chosen; primarily because of the way they applied amnesty in order to pursue a certain purpose. Though each of these cases shows several caveats, they help to understand how amnesty agreements may be applicable in different contexts and may be implemented in different ways to reach different outcomes, and ultimately justice.
BASE
RightwingLinks
[A corrected version of this dataset is available at http://doi.org/10.7802/1815 ]
RightWingLinks is a dataset comprised of 2,332,936 links to web pages on 4,058 different pay-level domains, which we extracted from 82,067 comments by 33,641 users on the public Facebook pages of the major established German political parties, the AfD party and the rightwing protest movement Pegida in the year 2015. The data is aggregated and contains synthetic identifiers.
GESIS
Could the United States Reinstitute an Official Torture Policy?
In: Journal of Strategic Security: JSS, Band 10, Heft 2, S. 97-118
ISSN: 1944-0472
Redefining Hybrid Warfare: Russia's Non-linear War against the West
In: Journal of Strategic Security: JSS, Band 10, Heft 1, S. 17-31
ISSN: 1944-0472