Environmental cooperation in Southeast Asia: ASEAN's regime for transboundary haze pollution
In: Routledge contemporary Southeast Asia series 29
10 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: Routledge contemporary Southeast Asia series 29
In: Routledge contemporary Southeast Asia series
In: Contemporary politics, Band 26, Heft 5, S. 553-572
ISSN: 1469-3631
In: Pacific affairs: an international review of Asia and the Pacific, Band 85, Heft 4, S. 723-743
ISSN: 1715-3379
In: Pacific affairs, Band 85, Heft 4, S. 723-744
ISSN: 0030-851X
The critique of Western-centrism in knowledge production in the discipline of international relations (IR) has led to attempts to incorporate regional experiences into the mainstream IR theorization. Ambivalence and challenges remain, however. They arise from the similar and shared histories that make distinguishing Western and non-Western ideas and theories difficult. Seeking to contribute to the debate on Western-centrism in IR theorization, I examine the cultural sources and history of political realism in Java. By tracing the history of struggles, political practices and the ideas such as the God-King, problems of some contemporary IR theories become evident. The boundaries between Western and non-Western political thinking, however, become less pronounced. (Pac Aff/GIGA)
World Affairs Online
In: Asian survey, Band 51, Heft 2, S. 356-378
ISSN: 1533-838X
This article examines ASEAN's cooperation on transboundary haze pollution. I argue that ASEAN's creation of the haze treaty in 2002 demonstrates its attempt to depart from certain elements of the institutional culture. But both ASEAN's treaty and cooperation have been hindered by certain normative constraints, organizational customs, and domestic politics.
In: Asian survey: a bimonthly review of contemporary Asian affairs, Band 51, Heft 2, S. 356-378
ISSN: 0004-4687
World Affairs Online
In: Routledge contemporary Southeast Asia series 29
In: Integration through law 7
In: the role of law and the rule of law in ASEAN integration
ASEAN as an Actor in International Fora addresses a blind spot in ASEAN research and in comparative regionalism studies by assessing why, how, when and to what extent ASEAN member governments achieve a collective presence in global fora. Written for academic researchers and practitioners working in areas such as international relations, political science and international law, it examines ASEAN's negotiating behavior with a novel four-point cohesion typology. The authors argue that ASEAN's 'cognitive prior' and its repository of cooperation norms have affected ASEAN's negotiation capacities, formats, strategies and cohesion in international fora. Using two case studies - one on ASEAN's cohesion in the WTO agricultural negotiations and one on UN negotiations on forced labor in Myanmar - they examine ASEAN's collective actions at different stages of negotiation, in different issue areas and in different negotiating fora. The book concludes by providing recommendations for strengthening ASEAN's international negotiation capacities
World Affairs Online