Suchergebnisse

Team display rules are expressive norms shared by team members about how to positively impact a customer's perception of service quality and satisfaction. For frontline employees' working in teams, however, the costs and benefits of team display rules are less clear as empirical links to objective, behavioral outcomes, such as turnover, are rare. In a study of 442 healthcare professionals, working within 72 teams in a large children's hospital, we investigate the effects of positive team display rules (i.e., shared expectations among team members to express positive emotions) and negative team display rules (i.e., shared expectations among team members to suppress negative emotions) on time-lagged objective voluntary turnover. We found that positive team display rules prompted retention, while negative team display rules reduced psychological attachment (i.e., affective commitment) and increased voluntary turnover 12 months later. Team negative affective tone (i.e., negative emotions associated with different healthcare team contexts) amplified the detrimental effects of negative team display rules. Overall, this study highlights the important and nuanced effects of the socioemotional context of service teams, in particular, the consequential influence of team display rules on FLEs turnover behavior in a critical service context, that is, healthcare.

Functional diversity in healthcare teams—where members from different healthcare professions work together—is often advocated as the key to achieving quality patient outcomes. However, although functionally diverse teams promise much, they do not always deliver on that promise. Based on the informational diversity perspective, we argue that functional diversity increases role conflict and is an important factor that can help to explain why functional diversity does not always lead to effective team performance. We also argue that team processes play an important role in moderating the effect of functional diversity on role conflict and that depending on how functionally diverse healthcare teams are, certain team processes are more important than others for reducing role conflict thereby leading to improved team performance. We contrast two specific team processes (interpersonal conflict management and back up and helping) and argue for their relative importance depending on the level of functional diversity in healthcare teams. Data from 75 hospital teams support our differential predictions that interpersonal conflict management is a particularly important team process for reducing role conflict and improving team performance for teams with high functional diversity, whereas for teams with low functional diversity, back up and helping is a more important team process. These results have important implications for the management of functionally diverse healthcare teams. By identifying the relative importance of team processes, these results provide evidence for investing in team processes that enable healthcare teams to reap the rewards of functional diversity.

Withdrawal from work by frontline employees (FLEs) is generally perceived by managers as counterproductive or anti-service behavior. However, there may be detrimental effects of continuing to provide a service, particularly after an FLE has experienced incivility. The possible beneficial effects of withdrawal on frontline service employees' well-being have rarely been investigated. In this article, we conducted two studies to examine the moderating role of on- and off-task withdrawal behaviors on the relationship between customer incivility and employees' emotional exhaustion. In Study 1, we examined parking officers' reactions to customer incivility. We found support for the role of off-task withdrawal as a resource-replenishing strategy, which mitigated the relationship between customer incivility and emotional exhaustion. In Study 2, we examined a sample of nurses in a large hospital to compare the replenishing potential of both on-task and off-task withdrawal strategies. We found that off-task withdrawal served a replenishing function, while on-task withdrawal aggravated nurses' feeling of emotional exhaustion as a result of customer incivility. These results highlight different resource implications, including recovery benefits of short-term withdrawal behaviors at work, and provide important theoretical and practical implications for the management of customer incivility and frontline service employees' well-being and performance.