Party campaigning in the 1980s: have the national parties made a comeback as key players in congressional elections? and Candidates, consultants and campaigns
In: International affairs, Band 66, Heft 1, S. 219-220
ISSN: 1468-2346
145 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: International affairs, Band 66, Heft 1, S. 219-220
ISSN: 1468-2346
In: International affairs, Band 65, Heft 1, S. 191-192
ISSN: 1468-2346
In: International affairs, Band 60, Heft 2, S. 357-358
ISSN: 1468-2346
In: American political science review, Band 76, Heft 2, S. 479
ISSN: 1537-5943
In: International affairs, Band 54, Heft 4, S. 646-647
ISSN: 1468-2346
In: International affairs, Band 53, Heft 3, S. 448-450
ISSN: 1468-2346
In: International affairs, Band 53, Heft 1, S. 104-105
ISSN: 1468-2346
In: International affairs, Band 52, Heft 2, S. 313-313
ISSN: 1468-2346
In: International affairs, Band 52, Heft 1, S. 148-149
ISSN: 1468-2346
In: International affairs, Band 51, Heft 1, S. 140-141
ISSN: 1468-2346
In: International affairs, Band 50, Heft 2, S. 341-342
ISSN: 1468-2346
In: International affairs, Band 50, Heft 1, S. 168-169
ISSN: 1468-2346
In: Government & opposition: an international journal of comparative politics, Band 8, Heft 2, S. 156-176
ISSN: 1477-7053
IN THE CABINET ROOM of RICHARD NIXON'S WHITE HOUSE THERE hang two portraits, one of Woodrow Wilson and one of Dwight D. Eisenhower. Report has it that they are the personal selection of the present incumbent, representing those of his predecessors whom he most admires. If so, they constitute an interesting choice, an unusual combination. Woodrow Wilson, in the type-casting of history, is a typical 'strong' President, the innovative leader who rules as well as reigns, the convinced mandatory of the popular will. Eisenhower, by contrast, represents a unique attempt in our time to recreate the 'weak' or 'strict constructionist' President of an earlier age, a quasi-monarchical head of state who does not seek to rule and does not claim for himself a larger or more authoritative mandate than that of his legislative colleagues. Moreover Wilson, despite his repudiation by the American people, saw himself as an active leader of his party, while Eisenhower, despite his landslide victories, thought it improper (or found it distasteful) to use the presidency as an instrument of party advantage.
In: Government & opposition: an international journal of comparative politics, Band 8, S. 156-176
ISSN: 0017-257X
In: International affairs, Band 47, Heft 4, S. 873-875
ISSN: 1468-2346