Search results

Comment mesurer la diffusion des modèles organisationnels issus du « nouveau management » dans l'État, les hôpitaux et les collectivités locales ? Cet article mobilise les enquêtes Conditions de travail 2005 à 2019 pour étendre aux administrations publiques les travaux statistiques portant sur les formes d'organisation du travail, habituellement réservés aux entreprises. L'analyse empirique en distingue cinq : l'autonomie du métier, l'autonomie évaluée, le contrôle direct, le lean management et le taylorisme flexible. Les professions organisées du public connaissent une érosion de leur autonomie collective sous l'effet de la diffusion des instruments d'évaluation formalisée tout en demeurant dans des organisations très qualifiantes. Les cadres de l'État et des établissements de santé adoptent largement le modèle du management par objectifs. Les agent·es subalternes des ministères et des hôpitaux publics voient se développer des organisations néotayloriennes très contraignantes. Il apparaît ainsi que les enjeux de la diffusion des techniques de gestion issues des grandes entreprises sont très différents selon la position des agent·es dans les hiérarchies administratives, du fait d'une répartition inégale des marges de manœuvre et des contraintes managériales.

Cet article se propose de revenir sur les origines du management public en France, en étudiant la Rationalisation des choix budgétaires (RCB) lancée en 1968 et, plus précisément, l'expérience ratée des « budgets de programmes ». L'objectif est de mettre en évidence sa contribution à l'institutionnalisation à long terme du calcul économique au sein de l'État français, mais aussi de montrer que, loin de préfigurer un quelconque néolibéralisme, ce projet s'inscrit au contraire initialement au sein d'une tentative de renouveau du Plan.

At the end of 1910', Max Weber wrote : in the sphere of everyday affairs, domination "consists precisely in administration". If he could come back one century later, he would say : "It consists in management." How to understand, from the viewpoint of an history of public and private bureaucracies, the current invasion of the public sphere by management technics ? This PhD in historical sociology studies the rise in business companies, and propagation in state administrations, of several power apparatuses in France from 1945 to nowadays. If we don't want to satisfy ourselves with the lazy explanation which relates it to "neoliberalism", we must replace the whole transformation into the long term history of public wage labor and the reinvention of capitalism. Main instrument of the first managerial revolution, management by objectives gave birth to a new organization of the firm : an individualized government of executives by numbers, directed towards the unlimited growth of the productivity of the work force. High civil servants from the national economic planning tried without success to transpose this kind of managerial bureaucracy into ministries : not in the name of "the market", but of employees' control, GDP growth and the power of French State. In the completely different context of 1990-2000' and financial capitalism, LOLF and RGPP finally instituted this government of public ser-vices by objectives, to serve a new end : public spending reduction. Health systems, tax collec-tion, administrative offices or unemployment offices have been reorganized on the basis of the integrated fordist firm model of the 1970'. Some high civil servants are now trying to radicalize this project with the imposition of a new kind of organization, even more dangerous to a democratic public service : the neoliberal bureaucracy of the network-firm arising from the second managerial revolution of 1980-1990', in which an important element is the government of direct producers by an individual competition, formalized by human ...

At the end of 1910', Max Weber wrote : in the sphere of everyday affairs, domination "consists precisely in administration". If he could come back one century later, he would say : "It consists in management." How to understand, from the viewpoint of an history of public and private bureaucracies, the current invasion of the public sphere by management technics ? This PhD in historical sociology studies the rise in business companies, and propagation in state administrations, of several power apparatuses in France from 1945 to nowadays. If we don't want to satisfy ourselves with the lazy explanation which relates it to "neoliberalism", we must replace the whole transformation into the long term history of public wage labor and the reinvention of capitalism. Main instrument of the first managerial revolution, management by objectives gave birth to a new organization of the firm : an individualized government of executives by numbers, directed towards the unlimited growth of the productivity of the work force. High civil servants from the national economic planning tried without success to transpose this kind of managerial bureaucracy into ministries : not in the name of "the market", but of employees' control, GDP growth and the power of French State. In the completely different context of 1990-2000' and financial capitalism, LOLF and RGPP finally instituted this government of public services by objectives, to serve a new end : public spending reduction. Health systems, tax collection, administrative offices or unemployment offices have been reorganized on the basis of the integrated fordist firm model of the 1970'. Some high civil servants are now trying to radicalize this project with the imposition of a new kind of organization, even more dangerous to a democratic public service : the neoliberal bureaucracy of the network-firm arising from the second managerial revolution of 1980-1990', in which an important element is the government of direct producers by an individual competition, formalized by human ...

At the end of 1910', Max Weber wrote : in the sphere of everyday affairs, domination "consists precisely in administration". If he could come back one century later, he would say : "It consists in management." How to understand, from the viewpoint of an history of public and private bureaucracies, the current invasion of the public sphere by management technics ? This PhD in historical sociology studies the rise in business companies, and propagation in state administrations, of several power apparatuses in France from 1945 to nowadays. If we don't want to satisfy ourselves with the lazy explanation which relates it to "neoliberalism", we must replace the whole transformation into the long term history of public wage labor and the reinvention of capitalism. Main instrument of the first managerial revolution, management by objectives gave birth to a new organization of the firm : an individualized government of executives by numbers, directed towards the unlimited growth of the productivity of the work force. High civil servants from the national economic planning tried without success to transpose this kind of managerial bureaucracy into ministries : not in the name of "the market", but of employees' control, GDP growth and the power of French State. In the completely different context of 1990-2000' and financial capitalism, LOLF and RGPP finally instituted this government of public ser-vices by objectives, to serve a new end : public spending reduction. Health systems, tax collec-tion, administrative offices or unemployment offices have been reorganized on the basis of the integrated fordist firm model of the 1970'. Some high civil servants are now trying to radicalize this project with the imposition of a new kind of organization, even more dangerous to a democratic public service : the neoliberal bureaucracy of the network-firm arising from the second managerial revolution of 1980-1990', in which an important element is the government of direct producers by an individual competition, formalized by human ...

At the end of 1910', Max Weber wrote : in the sphere of everyday affairs, domination "consists precisely in administration". If he could come back one century later, he would say : "It consists in management." How to understand, from the viewpoint of an history of public and private bureaucracies, the current invasion of the public sphere by management technics ? This PhD in historical sociology studies the rise in business companies, and propagation in state administrations, of several power apparatuses in France from 1945 to nowadays. If we don't want to satisfy ourselves with the lazy explanation which relates it to "neoliberalism", we must replace the whole transformation into the long term history of public wage labor and the reinvention of capitalism. Main instrument of the first managerial revolution, management by objectives gave birth to a new organization of the firm : an individualized government of executives by numbers, directed towards the unlimited growth of the productivity of the work force. High civil servants from the national economic planning tried without success to transpose this kind of managerial bureaucracy into ministries : not in the name of "the market", but of employees' control, GDP growth and the power of French State. In the completely different context of 1990-2000' and financial capitalism, LOLF and RGPP finally instituted this government of public services by objectives, to serve a new end : public spending reduction. Health systems, tax collection, administrative offices or unemployment offices have been reorganized on the basis of the integrated fordist firm model of the 1970'. Some high civil servants are now trying to radicalize this project with the imposition of a new kind of organization, even more dangerous to a democratic public service : the neoliberal bureaucracy of the network-firm arising from the second managerial revolution of 1980-1990', in which an important element is the government of direct producers by an individual competition, formalized by human ...

International audience ; Presentation of the second conference of young researchers in critical policy studies "The times of the rupture" that was held in January 2014 in Paris. ; Présentation du deuxième colloque des jeunes chercheurs en études critiques du politique " Les temps de la rupture " qui s'est tenu en janvier 2014 à Paris.

International audience ; Presentation of the second conference of young researchers in critical policy studies "The times of the rupture" that was held in January 2014 in Paris. ; Présentation du deuxième colloque des jeunes chercheurs en études critiques du politique " Les temps de la rupture " qui s'est tenu en janvier 2014 à Paris.

International audience ; Presentation of the second conference of young researchers in critical policy studies "The times of the rupture" that was held in January 2014 in Paris. ; Présentation du deuxième colloque des jeunes chercheurs en études critiques du politique " Les temps de la rupture " qui s'est tenu en janvier 2014 à Paris.